Why do good performing students highly rate their instructors? Evidence from a natural experiment

Donghun Cho, Wonyoung Baek, Joonmo Cho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article analyzes the behavior of students in a college classroom with regard to their evaluation of teacher performance. As some students are randomly able to see their grades prior to the evaluation, the "natural" experiment provides a unique opportunity for testing the hypothesis as to whether there exists a possibility of a hedonic (implicit) exchange between the students' grades and teaching evaluations. Students with good grades tend to highly rate the teaching quality of their instructors, in comparison with those who receive relatively poor grades. This study finds that students with better grades than their expected grades provide a psychological "gift" to their teachers by giving a higher teacher evaluation, whereas it is the opposite with those students receiving lower grades than their expectation. These empirical results demonstrate that a previous interpretation on the effect of student grades in an incumbent course with regard to the teaching quality may have to be somewhat discounted.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)172-179
Number of pages8
JournalEconomics of Education Review
Volume49
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2015

Keywords

  • Hedonic value of grade surplus
  • Psychological reward-penalty
  • Student evaluation
  • Student grade
  • Teaching quality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why do good performing students highly rate their instructors? Evidence from a natural experiment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this