TY - JOUR
T1 - Which Scoring System Best Predicts Long-term Survival in Patients With Spinal Metastasis in the Era of Targeted Systemic Treatment? A Comparative Study of Eight Prognostic Models
AU - Kang, Dong Ho
AU - Park, Jin Sung
AU - Kang, Minwook
AU - Jung, Kyunghun
AU - Lee, Chong Suh
AU - Park, Se Jun
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/9/1
Y1 - 2025/9/1
N2 - Study Design. Retrospective observational study. Objective. To evaluate the accuracy of eight scoring systems, including the Tomita, modified Tokuhashi, modified Bauer, Rades, Oswestry Spinal Risk index (OSRI), Lei, New England Spinal Metastasis Score, and Skeletal Oncology Research Group (SORG) nomogram, for predicting long-term survival of patients with spinal metastasis. Summary of Background Data. Predicting the prognosis of spinal metastasis is vital for surgical decisions, yet the effectiveness of existing scoring systems in identifying long-term survival remains unclear. Materials and Methods. A total of 456 cases were finally included. Prognostic scores were compared with survival outcomes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were analyzed for the entire cohort and across three distinct time periods to evaluate the area under the curve (AUC) for 1-year and 2-year survival, alongside Harrell’s C-statistic. Results. The mean patient age was 58.9 years, and the median survival time was 8.6 months. For the entire cohort, the SORG nomogram, OSRI, and modified Tokuhashi scores yielded the Harrell C-index values of 0.64, 0.63, and 0.62, respectively. For 1-year survival prediction, the SORG nomogram, OSRI, and modified Tokuhashi score demonstrated moderate discriminative power, with AUC values of 0.72, 0.71, and 0.70, respectively. Similarly, for 2-year survival prediction, the modified Tokuhashi score, SORG nomogram, and OSRI also revealed moderate discriminative power, with AUC values of 0.73, 0.72, and 0.70, respectively. For patients who underwent surgery in the most recent period, OSRI demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy for 1-year survival, with a Harrell’s C-index of 0.63 and an AUC of 0.68, and 2-year survival, with a Harrell’s C-index of 0.63 and an AUC of 0.64. Conclusion. Most scoring systems exhibited low discriminative power, with only the SORG nomogram, OSRI, and modified Tokuhashi scores demonstrating moderate power for predicting long-term survival. In the most recent period, the OSRI demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy for both 1-year and 2-year survival.
AB - Study Design. Retrospective observational study. Objective. To evaluate the accuracy of eight scoring systems, including the Tomita, modified Tokuhashi, modified Bauer, Rades, Oswestry Spinal Risk index (OSRI), Lei, New England Spinal Metastasis Score, and Skeletal Oncology Research Group (SORG) nomogram, for predicting long-term survival of patients with spinal metastasis. Summary of Background Data. Predicting the prognosis of spinal metastasis is vital for surgical decisions, yet the effectiveness of existing scoring systems in identifying long-term survival remains unclear. Materials and Methods. A total of 456 cases were finally included. Prognostic scores were compared with survival outcomes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were analyzed for the entire cohort and across three distinct time periods to evaluate the area under the curve (AUC) for 1-year and 2-year survival, alongside Harrell’s C-statistic. Results. The mean patient age was 58.9 years, and the median survival time was 8.6 months. For the entire cohort, the SORG nomogram, OSRI, and modified Tokuhashi scores yielded the Harrell C-index values of 0.64, 0.63, and 0.62, respectively. For 1-year survival prediction, the SORG nomogram, OSRI, and modified Tokuhashi score demonstrated moderate discriminative power, with AUC values of 0.72, 0.71, and 0.70, respectively. Similarly, for 2-year survival prediction, the modified Tokuhashi score, SORG nomogram, and OSRI also revealed moderate discriminative power, with AUC values of 0.73, 0.72, and 0.70, respectively. For patients who underwent surgery in the most recent period, OSRI demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy for 1-year survival, with a Harrell’s C-index of 0.63 and an AUC of 0.68, and 2-year survival, with a Harrell’s C-index of 0.63 and an AUC of 0.64. Conclusion. Most scoring systems exhibited low discriminative power, with only the SORG nomogram, OSRI, and modified Tokuhashi scores demonstrating moderate power for predicting long-term survival. In the most recent period, the OSRI demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy for both 1-year and 2-year survival.
KW - good prognosis
KW - long-term survival
KW - prognostic model
KW - scoring system
KW - spinal metastasis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85209190268
U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005205
DO - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005205
M3 - Article
C2 - 39498944
AN - SCOPUS:85209190268
SN - 0362-2436
VL - 50
SP - 1171
EP - 1179
JO - Spine
JF - Spine
IS - 17
ER -