Abstract
The goal of this research was to study how fear-arousing misinformation (FAM) elicits a backfire effect of web add-on correction and whether situational fear and situational threat appraisals intervene in the relationship. The study featured an online experiment (N = 167) with a 2 (misinformation: fear-neutral vs. fear-arousal) × 2 (presence of correction: no correction vs. web add-on correction) between-group factorial design. Results suggest that web add-on correction was effective in decreasing situational susceptibility when fear-neutral misinformation was displayed (but not when FAM was presented) and that this susceptibility is positively associated with belief in misinformation. The findings from this research highlight that emotional-laden misinformation and perceived susceptibility are key drivers of nullifying correction effects, thereby providing insight into mapping out strategies for mitigating persuasive effects misinformation in risky situations.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 70-90 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Journal of Applied Communication Research |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2022 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Fear-arousing misinformation
- health crisis
- social media
- susceptibility
- web add-on correction
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'When web add-on correction comes with fear-arousing misinformation in public health crisis: focusing on the role of risk perception in belief in misinformation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver