Vascular dynamics and BOLD fMRI: CBF level effects and analysis considerations

  • Alberto L. Vazquez
  • , Eric R. Cohen
  • , Vikas Gulani
  • , Luis Hernandez-Garcia
  • , Ying Zheng
  • , Gregory R. Lee
  • , Seong Gi Kim
  • , James B. Grotberg
  • , Douglas C. Noll

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Changes in the cerebral blood flow (CBF) baseline produce significant changes to the hemodynamic response. This work shows that increases in the baseline blood flow level produce blood oxygenation-level dependent (BOLD) and blood flow responses that are slower and lower in amplitude, while decreases in the baseline blood flow level produce faster and higher amplitude hemodynamic responses. This effect was characterized using a vascular model of the hemodynamic response that separated arterial blood flow response from the venous blood volume response and linked the input stimulus to the vascular response. The model predicted the baseline blood flow level effects to be dominated by changes in the arterial vasculature. Specifically, it predicted changes in the arterial blood flow time constant and venous blood volume time constant parameters of +294% and -24%, respectively, for a 27% increase in the baseline blood flow. The vascular model performance was compared to an empirical model of the hemodynamic response. The vascular and empirical hemodynamic models captured most of the baseline blood flow level effects observed and can be used to correct for these effects in fMRI data. While the empirical hemodynamic model is easy to implement, it did not incorporate any explicit physiological information.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1642-1655
Number of pages14
JournalNeuroImage
Volume32
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • BOLD, CBF
  • CBV
  • Hypercapnia
  • Hypocapnia
  • Linear Analysis
  • Vascular Reactivity
  • fMRI

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Vascular dynamics and BOLD fMRI: CBF level effects and analysis considerations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this