Validation of the easy-to-use lenvatinib prognostic index to predict prognosis in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with lenvatinib

  • Margherita Rimini
  • , Wonseok Kang
  • , Valentina Burgio
  • , Mara Persano
  • , Tamoko Aoki
  • , Shigeo Shimose
  • , Toshifumi Tada
  • , Takashi Kumada
  • , Takuya Sho
  • , Eleonora Lai
  • , Ciro Celsa
  • , Claudia Campani
  • , Matteo Tonnini
  • , Emiliano Tamburini
  • , Atsushi Hiraoka
  • , Koichi Takaguchi
  • , Naoshi Nishida
  • , Hideki Iwamoto
  • , Ei Itobayashi
  • , Kunihiko Tsuji
  • Naoya Sakamoto, Toru Ishikawa, Hidenori Toyoda, Masatoshi Kudo, Takumi Kawaguchi, Takeshi Hatanaka, Kazugiro Nouso, Goki Suda, Giuseppe Cabibbo, Fabio Marra, Angelo Della Corte, Francesca Ratti, Federica Pedica, Francesco De Cobelli, Luca Aldrighetti, Mario Scartozzi, Stefano Cascinu, Andrea Casadei-Gardini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Aim: The identification of new prognostic factors able to stratify hepatocellular carcinoma patients candidate to first-line therapy is urgent. In the present work we validated the prognostic value of the lenvatinib prognostic index. Methods: Data of Eastern and Western patients treated with lenvatinib as first-line for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B or C hepatocellular carcinoma were recollected. The lenvatinib prognostic index was composed by three classes of risk according with our previous study. The “low risk” group includes patients with prognostic nutritional index (PNI) >43.3 and with previous transarterial chemoembolization. The “medium risk” group includes patients with PNI >43.3, but without previous transarterial chemoembolization and patients with PNI <43.3, albumin-bilirubin grade 1 and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B. The “high risk” group includes patients with PNI <43.3, albumin-bilirubin grade 2, and patients with PNI <43.3, albumin-bilirubin grade 1 and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C. Results: A total of 717 patients were included. The median overall survival was 20.7 months (95% CI 16.1–51.6) in patients with low risk (n = 223), 16.7 months (95% CI 13.3–47.0) in patients with medium risk (n = 264), and 10.7 months (95% CI 9.3–12.2) in patients with high risk (n = 230; HR 1, 1.29, and 1.92, respectively; p < 0.0001). Median progression-free survival was 7.3 months (95% CI 6.3–46.5) in patients with low risk, 6.4 months (95% CI 5.3–8.0) in patients with medium risk, and 4.9 months (95% CI 4.3–5.5) in patients with high risk (HR 1, 1.07, 1.47 respectively; p = 0.0009). Conclusion: The lenvatinib prognostic index confirms its prognostic value on an external cohort of hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with Lenvatinib.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1050-1059
Number of pages10
JournalHepatology Research
Volume52
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • hepatocellular carcinoma
  • lenvatinib
  • prognostic factors

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of the easy-to-use lenvatinib prognostic index to predict prognosis in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with lenvatinib'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this