TY - JOUR
T1 - User Preferences on a Generative AI User Interface Through a Choice Experiment
AU - Yeon, Jesun
AU - Jung, Youchan
AU - Baek, Yongki
AU - Lee, Daeho
AU - Shin, Jungwoo
AU - Chung, Won Young
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Since the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022, the number of services providing generative AI has been steadily increasing. As different services enter the market, the generative AI interfaces users experience become more diverse. However, none of the services has yet established itself as the dominant tool, and which interface component affects user preferences the most has yet to be identified. This study investigates user preferences based on the interface of generative AI services currently on the market. We investigated users’ preferred interface components by setting the output data type, generative style, output variation, reference style, and generation history provided by the current generative AI service as properties. We collected data from 500 users through a survey and conducted conjoint analysis. Users preferred the provision of 10 generation histories the most, and the second most preferred the provision of reference style in footnote format. In addition, it was found that there was no preference for the creative generative style, which can be interpreted as users being aware of the problem of hallucination in generative AI. The results of this study will help future generative AI services design interfaces that consider user experience.
AB - Since the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022, the number of services providing generative AI has been steadily increasing. As different services enter the market, the generative AI interfaces users experience become more diverse. However, none of the services has yet established itself as the dominant tool, and which interface component affects user preferences the most has yet to be identified. This study investigates user preferences based on the interface of generative AI services currently on the market. We investigated users’ preferred interface components by setting the output data type, generative style, output variation, reference style, and generation history provided by the current generative AI service as properties. We collected data from 500 users through a survey and conducted conjoint analysis. Users preferred the provision of 10 generation histories the most, and the second most preferred the provision of reference style in footnote format. In addition, it was found that there was no preference for the creative generative style, which can be interpreted as users being aware of the problem of hallucination in generative AI. The results of this study will help future generative AI services design interfaces that consider user experience.
KW - Generative AI
KW - choice experiment
KW - mixed logit model
KW - user interface
KW - user-centered design
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85203684494
U2 - 10.1080/10447318.2024.2400379
DO - 10.1080/10447318.2024.2400379
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85203684494
SN - 1044-7318
VL - 41
SP - 7626
EP - 7637
JO - International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
JF - International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
IS - 12
ER -