Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Use of archival versus newly collected tumor samples for assessing PD-L1 expression and overall survival: An updated analysis of keynote-010 trial

  • R. S. Herbst
  • , P. Baas
  • , J. L. Perez-Gracia
  • , E. Felip
  • , D. W. Kim
  • , J. Y. Han
  • , J. R. Molina
  • , J. H. Kim
  • , C. Dubos Arvis
  • , M. J. Ahn
  • , M. Majem
  • , M. J. Fidler
  • , V. Surmont
  • , G. De Castro
  • , M. Garrido
  • , Y. Shentu
  • , K. Emancipator
  • , A. Samkari
  • , E. H. Jensen
  • , G. M. Lubiniecki
  • E. B. Garon
  • Yale University
  • Netherlands Cancer Institute
  • University of Navarra
  • Vall d’Hebron University Hospital
  • Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology
  • Seoul National University
  • National Cancer Center
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • CHA University
  • Centre Georges-François Leclerc
  • Sungkyunkwan University
  • Hospital de Sant Pau
  • Rush University Medical Center
  • Ghent University
  • Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
  • Merck
  • University of California at Los Angeles

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Background In KEYNOTE-010, pembrolizumab versus docetaxel improved overall survival (OS) in patients with programmed death-1 protein (PD)-L1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A prespecified exploratory analysis compared outcomes in patients based on PD-L1 expression in archival versus newly collected tumor samples using recently updated survival data. Patients and methods PD-L1 was assessed centrally by immunohistochemistry (22C3 antibody) in archival or newly collected tumor samples. Patients received pembrolizumab 2 or 10 mg/kg Q3W or docetaxel 75 mg/m 2 Q3W for 24 months or until progression/intolerable toxicity/other reason. Response was assessed by RECIST v1.1 every 9 weeks, survival every 2 months. Primary end points were OS and progression-free survival (PFS) in tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50% and ≥1%; pembrolizumab doses were pooled in this analysis. Results At date cut-off of 24 March 2017, median follow-up was 31 months (range 23-41) representing 18 additional months of follow-up from the primary analysis. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel continued to improve OS in patients with previously treated, PD-L1-expressing advanced NSCLC; hazard ratio (HR) was 0.66 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57, 0.77]. Of 1033 patients analyzed, 455(44%) were enrolled based on archival samples and 578 (56%) on newly collected tumor samples. Approximately 40% of archival samples and 45% of newly collected tumor samples were PD-L1 TPS ≥50%. For TPS ≥50%, the OS HRs were 0.64 (95% CI: 0.45, 0.91) and 0.40 (95% CI: 0.28, 0.56) for archival and newly collected samples, respectively. In patients with TPS ≥1%, OS HRs were 0.74 (95% CI: 0.59, 0.93) and 0.59 (95% CI: 0.48, 0.73) for archival and newly collected samples, respectively. In TPS ≥50%, PFS HRs were similar across archival [0.63 (95% CI: 0.45, 0.89)] and newly collected samples [0.53 (95% CI: 0.38, 0.72)]. In patients with TPS ≥1%, PFS HRs were similar across archival [0.82 (95% CI: 0.66, 1.02)] and newly collected samples [0.83 (95% CI: 0.68, 1.02)]. Conclusion Pembrolizumab continued to improve OS over docetaxel in intention to treat population and in subsets of patients with newly collected and archival samples. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01905657.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)281-289
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Oncology
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Feb 2019
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Pd-l1 expression
  • Pembrolizumab
  • Tumor samples

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Use of archival versus newly collected tumor samples for assessing PD-L1 expression and overall survival: An updated analysis of keynote-010 trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this