Updated Efficacy and Safety From the Phase 2 PHAROS Study of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib in Patients With BRAF V600E-Mutant Metastatic NSCLC—A Brief Report

Gregory J. Riely, Myung Ju Ahn, Jeffrey M. Clarke, Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, Raymond Esper, Enriqueta Felip, Francesco Gelsomino, Jonathan W. Goldman, Maen Hussein, Melissa Johnson, Kristen A. Marrone, Daniel Morgensztern, Ernest Nadal, Marcelo V. Negrao, Michael Offin, Mariano Provencio, Suresh S. Ramalingam, Logan Roof, Rachel E. Sanborn, Egbert F. SmitAnne Tsao, Tiziana Usari, Ann Alcasid, Keith Wilner, Svitlana Tonkovyd, Xiaosong Zhang, Bruce E. Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: The PHAROS primary analysis revealed robust antitumor activity and acceptable safety with encorafenib plus binimetinib in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC). We report results after 18 months of additional follow-up. Methods: In this ongoing open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study, patients with BRAF V600E-mutant mNSCLC (59 treatment-naive and 39 previously treated) received encorafenib 450 mg once daily and binimetinib 45 mg twice daily. Primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: At this data cutoff, median treatment duration with encorafenib plus binimetinib was 16.3 months in treatment-naive and 5.5 months in previously treated patients; minimum follow-up was approximately 32 and 22 months, respectively. In treatment-naive patients, the ORR was 75%, median DOR was 40.0 months, median PFS was 30.2 months, median OS was not estimable (95% confidence interval: 31.3–not estimable), and the 3-year OS probability was 53%. In previously treated patients, the ORR was 46%, median DOR was 16.7 months, median PFS was 9.3 months, median OS was 22.7 months, and the 3-year OS probability was 29%. Overall, the most frequent treatment-related adverse events were nausea (52%), diarrhea (44%), fatigue (33%), and vomiting (30%). Treatment-related adverse events led to dose reductions and permanent treatment discontinuations in 25 (26%) and 16 (16%) patients, respectively. Conclusions: With longer follow-up, encorafenib plus binimetinib showed durable and clinically meaningful antitumor activity, especially in treatment-naive patients, with a manageable safety profile in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant mNSCLC. Clinical Trial Information:ClinicalTrials.govIdentifier:NCT03915951

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1538-1547
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Thoracic Oncology
Volume20
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2025

Keywords

  • BRAF
  • Binimetinib
  • Encorafenib
  • Non–small cell lung cancer

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Updated Efficacy and Safety From the Phase 2 PHAROS Study of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib in Patients With BRAF V600E-Mutant Metastatic NSCLC—A Brief Report'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this