Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Unenhanced Breast MRI With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Breast Cancer Detection: Effects of Training on Performance and Agreement of Subspecialty Radiologists

  • Yeon Soo Kim
  • , Su Hyun Lee
  • , Soo Yeon Kim
  • , Eun Sil Kim
  • , Ah Reum Park
  • , Jung Min Chang
  • , Vivian Youngjean Park
  • , Jung Hyun Yoon
  • , Bong Joo Kang
  • , Bo La Yun
  • , Tae Hee Kim
  • , Eun Sook Ko
  • , A. Jung Chu
  • , Jin You Kim
  • , Inyoung Youn
  • , Eun Young Chae
  • , Woo Jung Choi
  • , Hee Jeong Kim
  • , Soo Hee Kang
  • , Su Min Ha
  • Woo Kyung Moon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether reader training improves the performance and agreement of radiologists in interpreting unenhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Materials and Methods: A study of 96 breasts (35 cancers, 24 benign, and 37 negative) in 48 asymptomatic women was performed between June 2019 and October 2020. High-resolution DWI with b-values of 0, 800, and 1200 sec/mm2 was performed using a 3.0-T system. Sixteen breast radiologists independently reviewed the DWI, apparent diffusion coefficient maps, and T1-weighted MRI scans and recorded the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category for each breast. After a 2-h training session and a 5-month washout period, they re-evaluated the BI-RADS categories. A BI-RADS category of 4 (lesions with at least two suspicious criteria) or 5 (more than two suspicious criteria) was considered positive. The per-breast diagnostic performance of each reader was compared between the first and second reviews. Inter-reader agreement was evaluated using a multi-rater κ analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: Before training, the mean sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the 16 readers were 70.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 59.4–79.9), 90.8% (95% CI: 85.6–94.2), and 83.5% (95% CI: 78.6–87.4), respectively. After training, significant improvements in specificity (95.2%; 95% CI: 90.8–97.5; P = 0.001) and accuracy (85.9%; 95% CI: 80.9–89.8; P = 0.01) were observed, but no difference in sensitivity (69.8%; 95% CI: 58.1–79.4; P = 0.58) was observed. Regarding inter-reader agreement, the κ values were 0.57 (95% CI: 0.52–0.63) before training and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.62–0.74) after training, with a difference of 0.11 (95% CI: 0.02–0.18; P = 0.01). The ICC was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.69–0.74) before training and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.76–0.80) after training (P = 0.002). Conclusion: Brief reader training improved the performance and agreement of interpretations by breast radiologists using unenhanced MRI with DWI.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11-23
Number of pages13
JournalKorean Journal of Radiology
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Breast
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Diffusion-weighted imaging
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Training

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Unenhanced Breast MRI With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Breast Cancer Detection: Effects of Training on Performance and Agreement of Subspecialty Radiologists'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this