Understanding the coronary bifurcation stenting

Coronary bifurcation stenting is still complex and associated with a high risk of stent thrombosis and restenosis even with contemporary techniques. Although provisional approach has been proved to be the standard strategy of treatment, There is still lack of evidences for multiple steps of the procedure. For so many years we have been focused on the optimization of side branch (SB), but the clinical outcome is mostly dependent on the main vessel (MV) stenting. The optimal expansion of MV stent without the compromise of SB is the ultimate goal to achieve in the coronary bifurcation stenting. Understanding the anatomy and physiology of coronary bifurcation lesion should be the most important step to this goal. The relationship of vessel diameter between branches and the anatomical and functional signifcance of plaque shif and carina shif are two most important concepts to understand. They are the science behind the predictors of SB occlusion, and the rationale of proximal optimization technique and fnal kissing ballooning. This specifc review will be devoted to review those concepts as well as clinical evidences to support them.