Transjugular liver biopsy: Modified Ross transseptal needle versus Quick-core biopsy needle

S. W. Choo, Y. S. Do, K. B. Park, S. H. Kim, Y. H. Han, I. W. Choo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the differences in sample adequacy and safety between a transseptal needle and Quick-core biopsy needle for transjugular liver biopsy. Methods: Eighteen consecutive patients who had a bleeding diatheses and/or ascites underwent transjugular liver biopsy using a transseptal needle (11 patients) and Quick-core biopsy needle (seven patients). The length of the specimens was measured before fixation. A pathologist reviewed histologic slides for sample adequacy and pathologic diagnoses. Clinical records were reviewed for complication. Results: In all patients, liver biopsy was successful. A total of 45 specimens were obtained, with an average of 2.5 passes per patient. The length of specimen was significantly longer with the Quick-core biopsy needle than with the transseptal needle (p < 0.05). Biopsied tissue was fragmented in 17 of 25 specimens with the transseptal needle but not fragmented in any specimen with the Quick-core biopsy needle. All specimens were determined to be adequate except one with the transseptal needle. There was no early or delayed complication in any patient. Conclusion: Transjugular liver biopsy is a safe and effective procedure without any significant difference in complication and adequacy when using a transseptal needle or Quick-core biopsy needle. Larger specimens can be obtained without tissue fragmentation with the Quick-core biopsy needle.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)483-485
Number of pages3
JournalAbdominal Imaging
Volume25
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2000

Keywords

  • Interventional procedures
  • Liver disease, biopsy
  • Transjugular biopsy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Transjugular liver biopsy: Modified Ross transseptal needle versus Quick-core biopsy needle'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this