Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Three-Year Follow-Up and Response-Survival Relationship of Nivolumab in Previously Treated Patients with Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ATTRACTION-3)

  • Morihito Okada
  • , Ken Kato
  • , Byoung Chul Cho
  • , Masanobu Takahashi
  • , Chen Yuan Lin
  • , Keisho Chin
  • , Shigenori Kadowaki
  • , Myung Ju Ahn
  • , Yasuo Hamamoto
  • , Yuichiro Doki
  • , Chueh Chuan Yen
  • , Yutaro Kubota
  • , Sung Bae Kim
  • , Chih Hung Hsu
  • , Eva Holtved
  • , Ioannis Xynos
  • , Yasuhiro Matsumura
  • , Akira Takazawa
  • , Yuko Kitagawa
  • Hiroshima University
  • National Cancer Center Japan
  • Yonsei University
  • Tohoku University
  • China Medical University Taichung
  • Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research
  • Aichi Cancer Center Hospital and Research Institute
  • Sungkyunkwan University
  • Keio University
  • The University of Osaka
  • National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
  • Showa Medical University
  • University of Ulsan
  • National Taiwan University
  • University of Southern Denmark
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Limited long-term data are available on immune checkpoint inhibitor use in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We report 3-year follow-up data from our study of nivolumab versus chemotherapy (paclitaxel or docetaxel) in patients with previously treated ESCC. Patients and Methods: ATTRACTION-3 was a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III trial. Overall survival (OS), time from randomization to death from any cause, was the primary endpoint. An exploratory subanalysis assessed OS according to the best overall response (BOR) with and without landmark at 4 months. Results: Of the enrolled patients, 210 received nivolumab and 209 received chemotherapy. With a minimum follow-up of 36.0 months, OS was longer in the nivolumab versus the chemotherapy group (median, 10.9 vs. 8.5 months; HR, 0.79; P = 0.0264), with 3-year OS rates of 15.3% and 8.7%, respectively. The median OS was longer with nivolumab versus chemotherapy irrespective of the BOR (complete response/partial response: 19.9 vs. 15.4 months; stable disease: 17.4 vs. 8.8 months; and progressive disease: 7.6 vs. 4.2 months). Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events were reported in 40 patients (19.1%) in the nivolumab group and 133 patients (63.9%) in the chemotherapy group. Conclusions: Nivolumab as second-line therapy demonstrated clinically meaningful long-term improvement in OS compared with chemotherapy in previously treated patients with advanced ESCC. The OS was consistently improved in the nivolumab group compared with the chemotherapy group regardless of BOR. Nivolumab was well tolerated over the 3-year follow-up.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3277-3286
Number of pages10
JournalClinical Cancer Research
Volume28
Issue number15
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Aug 2022
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Three-Year Follow-Up and Response-Survival Relationship of Nivolumab in Previously Treated Patients with Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ATTRACTION-3)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this