Abstract
In this paper, I suggest a way of resolving the whole-part dilemma suggested in the Parmenides. Specifically, I argue that grab-bing the second horn of the dilemma does not pose a significant chal-lenge. To argue for this, I consider two theses about Forms, namely, the oneness and indivisibility theses. More specifically, I argue that the second horn does not violate the oneness thesis if we treat com-position as identity and that the indivisibility thesis ought to be re-interpreted given Plato's later dialogues. By doing so, I suggest a compositional understanding of Plato's theory of Forms, which can resolve the whole-part dilemma.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 246-267 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Organon F |
| Volume | 2022 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2022 |
Keywords
- one and many
- Parmenides
- Plato
- theory of Forms