Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging Project for Lung Cancer: Proposals for the Revision of the N Descriptors in the Forthcoming Ninth Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer

  • Members of the Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee, Members of the Advisory Boards, and Participating Institutions of the Lung Cancer Domain
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • Baptist Cancer Center
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  • Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
  • King's College London
  • San Camillo Hospital
  • Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences
  • Yale University
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
  • Ghent University
  • Imperial College London
  • Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
  • Tel Aviv University
  • Medical University of Vienna
  • Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen
  • University of Bern
  • University of Barcelona
  • Centro de Investigacion en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES) Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
  • University of Zurich
  • Universidad de los Andes Chile
  • University of Antwerp
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Keio University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: The accurate assessment of nodal (N) status is crucial to the management and prognostication of nonmetastatic NSCLC. We sought to determine whether the current N descriptors should be maintained or revised for the upcoming ninth edition of the international TNM lung cancer staging system. Methods: Data were assembled by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer on patients with NSCLC, detailing both clinical and pathologic N status, with information about anatomical location and individual station-level identification. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and prognostic groups were assessed by a Cox regression analysis. Results: Data for clinical N and pathologic N status were available in 45,032 and 35,009 patients, respectively. The current N0 to N3 descriptors for both clinical N and pathologic N categories reflect prognostically distinct groups. Furthermore, single-station N2 involvement (N2a) exhibited a better prognosis than multistation N2 involvement (N2b) in both clinical and pathologic classifications, and the differences between all neighboring nodal subcategories were highly significant. The prognostic differences between N2a and N2b were robust and consistent across resection status, histologic type, T category, and geographic region. Conclusions: The current N descriptors should be maintained, with the addition of new subdescriptors to N2 for single-station involvement (N2a) and multiple-station involvement (N2b).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)766-785
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Thoracic Oncology
Volume19
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Lung cancer
  • Lung cancer staging
  • Lymph node metastasis
  • N component
  • N descriptors
  • TNM classification

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging Project for Lung Cancer: Proposals for the Revision of the N Descriptors in the Forthcoming Ninth Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this