The influence of epidural catheter on the incidence of intravascular injection during caudal block

Jin Young Lee, Sung Hyun Lee, Woo Seog Sim, Duk Kyung Kim, Sang Hoon Lee, Hyo Min Yun, Hue Jung Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of epidural catheters on the incidence of intravascular injection and to identify possible predictors of intravascular injection in patients undergoing a caudal block using fluoroscopy. Methods: A total of 154 patients scheduled to receive a caudal block were randomized into group N (those without epidural catheter) or group C (those with epidural catheter). Demographic and clinical data were recorded and analyzed. Results: The incidence of intravascular injection was 15.6% in group N, 6.5% in group C, and 11.0% overall, without statistical differences between the two groups (P = 0.105). Univariate analysis revealed that blood at hub (P = 0.047) and positive aspiration test (P = 0.045) were more frequently observed in group N than in group C. Quality of analgesia was significantly higher in group C than in group N (P = 0.029). Multivariate analysis identified older age (P = 0.024), blood at hub (P = 0.003), and positive aspiration test (P = 0.001) as predictors of intravascular injection. Conclusions: In this study, while the incidence of intravascular injection during caudal blocks was less frequent with epidural catheter use, it was not statistically significant. However, a caudal block using an epidural catheter provided a lower incidence of blood at hub, fewer positive aspiration tests, and superiority in pain improvement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1707-1713
Number of pages7
JournalSkeletal Radiology
Volume46
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2017

Keywords

  • Aspiration test
  • Blood at hub
  • Catheter
  • Caudal block
  • Epidural
  • Vascular

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The influence of epidural catheter on the incidence of intravascular injection during caudal block'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this