The impact of antimicrobial de-escalation therapy in culture-negative pneumonia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background/Aims: Antimicrobial de-escalation (ADE) remains a challenging strategy in the treatment of pneumonia. We investigated the outcomes of ADE as measured by mortality and duration of the use of antibiotics in patients with culture-negative pneumonia. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality. Results: We examined six studies comprising 11,933 subjects, of whom 1,152 received ADE. Overall, the ADE strategy was associated with a statistically lower risk of in-hospital mortality compared with non-ADE (risk ratio [RR] = 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.38 to 0.93). Although substantial heterogeneity was found among the included studies (I2 = 66%), a meta-regression analysis could not reveal plausible sources of heterogeneity. And ADE was associated with a shorter duration of total and initial antibiotic therapies and total length of hospital stay compared with non-ADE. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that ADE seems to be significantly associated with better clinical outcomes compared with non-ADE. Caution is demanded when interpreting data of this study because of substantial between-study heterogeneity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)704-713
Number of pages10
JournalKorean Journal of Internal Medicine
Volume38
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Anti-bacterial agents
  • Antimicrobial stewardship
  • Meta-analysis
  • Pneumonia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of antimicrobial de-escalation therapy in culture-negative pneumonia: A systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this