TY - JOUR
T1 - Temporal Dynamics and Biological Variability of Alzheimer Biomarkers
AU - the ADNI, TRIAD, and K-ROAD study groups
AU - Yun, Jihwan
AU - Shin, Daeun
AU - Lee, Eun Hye
AU - Kim, Jun Pyo
AU - Ham, Hongki
AU - Gu, Yuna
AU - Chun, Min Young
AU - Kang, Sung Hoon
AU - Kim, Hee Jin
AU - Na, Duk L.
AU - Kim, Chi Hun
AU - Kim, Ko Woon
AU - Kim, Si Eun
AU - Kim, Yeshin
AU - Kim, Jaeho
AU - Jung, Na Yeon
AU - Kim, Yeo Jin
AU - Cho, Soo Hyun
AU - Zetterberg, Henrik
AU - Blennow, Kaj
AU - Gonzalez-Ortiz, Fernando
AU - Ashton, Nicholas J.
AU - Therriault, Joseph
AU - Rahmouni, Nesrine
AU - Rosa-Neto, Pedro
AU - Weiner, Michael W.
AU - Seo, Sang Won
AU - Jang, Hyemin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 American Medical Association. All rights reserved,
PY - 2025/4/14
Y1 - 2025/4/14
N2 - IMPORTANCE Understanding the characteristics of discordance between plasma biomarkers and positron emission tomography (PET) results in Alzheimer disease (AD) is crucial for accurate interpretation of the findings. OBJECTIVE To compare (1) medical comorbidities affecting plasma biomarker concentrations, (2) imaging and clinical features, and (3) cognitive changes between plasma biomarker and PET discordant and concordant cases. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This multicenter cohort study, conducted between 2016 and 2023, included individuals with unimpaired cognition, mild cognitive impairment, or Alzheimer-type dementia, who had both amyloid β (Aβ) PET imaging and plasma biomarkers. A subset of participants also underwent tau PET imaging. EXPOSURES Participants were categorized into 4 groups based on their plasma and PET biomarker results: plasma−/PET−, plasma+/PET−, plasma−/PET+, and plasma+/PET+. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Clinical characteristics were compared between the 4 groups, focusing on the discordant groups. RESULTS A total of 2611 participants (mean [SD] age was 71.2 [8.7] years; 1656 female [63.4%]), of whom 124 additionally underwent tau PET, were included. Among the plasma biomarkers, phosphorylated tau (p-tau) 217 exhibited the highest concordance rate with Aβ (2326 of 2571 [90.5%]) and tau (100 of 120 [83.3%]) PET. The p-tau217+/Aβ PET− group was older (mean [SD] age, 75.8 [7.2] years vs 70.0 [8.8] years; P < .001) with a higher prevalence of hypertension (56 of 152 [36.8%] vs 266 of 1073 [25.0%]), diabetes (40 of 152 [26.3%] vs 156 of 1059 [14.7%]), and chronic kidney disease (17 of 152 [11.2%] vs 21 of 1073 [2.0%]) compared with the p-tau217−/Aβ PET− group (P < .001 for all). Body mass index was higher in p-tau217−/Aβ PET+ than in p-tau217+/Aβ PET+ (mean [SD], 24.1 [2.8] vs 23.1 [3.1], respectively; P = .001; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared). The p-tau217+/Aβ PET− group had lower hippocampal volume (mean [SD], 2555.4 [576.9] vs 2979.1 [545.8]; P < .001) and worse clinical trajectory compared with p-tau217−/Aβ PET− (β = −0.53; P < .001). In contrast, tau PET discordant cases did not show significant differences in medical comorbidities or clinical outcomes compared with the p-tau217−/tau PET− group. Only the p-tau 217+/tau PET+ group demonstrated faster cognitive deterioration compared with the p-tau 217−/tau PET− group (β = −1.66; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Results of this cohort study suggest that the mechanisms underlying the discordance between plasma biomarkers and PET findings may be multifaceted, underscoring the need to consider the temporal dynamics and biological variability of plasma biomarkers.
AB - IMPORTANCE Understanding the characteristics of discordance between plasma biomarkers and positron emission tomography (PET) results in Alzheimer disease (AD) is crucial for accurate interpretation of the findings. OBJECTIVE To compare (1) medical comorbidities affecting plasma biomarker concentrations, (2) imaging and clinical features, and (3) cognitive changes between plasma biomarker and PET discordant and concordant cases. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This multicenter cohort study, conducted between 2016 and 2023, included individuals with unimpaired cognition, mild cognitive impairment, or Alzheimer-type dementia, who had both amyloid β (Aβ) PET imaging and plasma biomarkers. A subset of participants also underwent tau PET imaging. EXPOSURES Participants were categorized into 4 groups based on their plasma and PET biomarker results: plasma−/PET−, plasma+/PET−, plasma−/PET+, and plasma+/PET+. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Clinical characteristics were compared between the 4 groups, focusing on the discordant groups. RESULTS A total of 2611 participants (mean [SD] age was 71.2 [8.7] years; 1656 female [63.4%]), of whom 124 additionally underwent tau PET, were included. Among the plasma biomarkers, phosphorylated tau (p-tau) 217 exhibited the highest concordance rate with Aβ (2326 of 2571 [90.5%]) and tau (100 of 120 [83.3%]) PET. The p-tau217+/Aβ PET− group was older (mean [SD] age, 75.8 [7.2] years vs 70.0 [8.8] years; P < .001) with a higher prevalence of hypertension (56 of 152 [36.8%] vs 266 of 1073 [25.0%]), diabetes (40 of 152 [26.3%] vs 156 of 1059 [14.7%]), and chronic kidney disease (17 of 152 [11.2%] vs 21 of 1073 [2.0%]) compared with the p-tau217−/Aβ PET− group (P < .001 for all). Body mass index was higher in p-tau217−/Aβ PET+ than in p-tau217+/Aβ PET+ (mean [SD], 24.1 [2.8] vs 23.1 [3.1], respectively; P = .001; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared). The p-tau217+/Aβ PET− group had lower hippocampal volume (mean [SD], 2555.4 [576.9] vs 2979.1 [545.8]; P < .001) and worse clinical trajectory compared with p-tau217−/Aβ PET− (β = −0.53; P < .001). In contrast, tau PET discordant cases did not show significant differences in medical comorbidities or clinical outcomes compared with the p-tau217−/tau PET− group. Only the p-tau 217+/tau PET+ group demonstrated faster cognitive deterioration compared with the p-tau 217−/tau PET− group (β = −1.66; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Results of this cohort study suggest that the mechanisms underlying the discordance between plasma biomarkers and PET findings may be multifaceted, underscoring the need to consider the temporal dynamics and biological variability of plasma biomarkers.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105013365558
U2 - 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.5263
DO - 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.5263
M3 - Article
C2 - 39960728
AN - SCOPUS:105013365558
SN - 2168-6149
VL - 82
SP - 384
EP - 396
JO - JAMA Neurology
JF - JAMA Neurology
IS - 4
ER -