Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

TAS-118 (S-1 plus leucovorin) versus S-1 in patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study (GRAPE trial)

  • Tatsuya Ioka
  • , Makoto Ueno
  • , Hideki Ueno
  • , Joon Oh Park
  • , Heung Moon Chang
  • , Naoki Sasahira
  • , Masashi Kanai
  • , Ik Joo Chung
  • , Masafumi Ikeda
  • , Shoji Nakamori
  • , Nobumasa Mizuno
  • , Yasushi Omuro
  • , Taketo Yamaguchi
  • , Hiroki Hara
  • , Kazuya Sugimori
  • , Junji Furuse
  • , Hiroyuki Maguchi
  • , Masayuki Furukawa
  • , Kengo Fukuzawa
  • , Jun Suk Kim
  • Seigo Yukisawa, Masahiro Takeuchi, Takuji Okusaka, Narikazu Boku, Ichinosuke Hyodo
  • Osaka International Cancer Institute
  • Kanagawa Cancer Center Research Institute
  • National Cancer Center Japan
  • University of Ulsan
  • Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research
  • Kyoto University
  • Chonnam National University
  • National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital
  • Aichi Cancer Center Hospital and Research Institute
  • Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital
  • Chiba Cancer Center
  • Saitama Cancer Center
  • Yokohama City University
  • Kyorin University
  • Teine Keijinkai Hospital
  • National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center
  • Japanese Red Cross Oita Hospital
  • Korea University
  • Tochigi Cancer Center
  • Kitasato University
  • University of Tsukuba

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: In our previous randomised phase 2 study for patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer, S-1 plus leucovorin improved progression-free survival compared with S-1 alone. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of TAS-118 (S-1 plus leucovorin) versus S-1 in overall survival (OS). Patients and methods: This randomised, open-label, phase 3 study was conducted at 58 centres in Japan and Korea. Patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer that progressed during first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy or recurred during or after post-operative gemcitabine-based adjuvant treatment were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either S-1 (40–60 mg, twice daily for 4 weeks in a 6-week cycle) or TAS-118 (S-1 40–60 mg plus leucovorin 25 mg, twice daily for 1 week in a 2-week cycle). The primary end-point was OS. Results: A total of 603 patients were randomised, and 300 and 301 patients received TAS-118 and S-1, respectively. There was no difference in OS between groups (median OS for TAS-118 versus S-1, 7.6 months versus 7.9 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.98 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.82–1.16]; P = 0.756). Progression-free survival was significantly longer with TAS-118 than S-1 (median, 3.9 months versus 2.8 months; HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.67–0.95]; P = 0.009). There were interactions between Japan and Korea (P = 0.004) and between unresectable and recurrent disease (P = 0.025) in OS. Incidence, profile and severity of adverse events were similar between groups. Conclusion: TAS-118 did not improve OS in patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer compared to S-1. Further studies are needed to find patients who have benefit from adding leucovorin to S-1.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)78-88
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean Journal of Cancer
Volume106
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2019

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Fluorouracil
  • Leucovorin
  • Pancreatic cancer
  • S-1
  • Second-line chemotherapy
  • TAS-118

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'TAS-118 (S-1 plus leucovorin) versus S-1 in patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study (GRAPE trial)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this