TY - JOUR
T1 - Scope position is a determining factor for diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for mass lesions in the pancreatic head
AU - Kim, Nam Hee
AU - Kim, Hong Joo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023, Society of Gastrointestinal Intervention.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background: This study aimed to identify the clinical and endoscopic factors that determined the diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for mass lesions in the pancreatic head. Methods: A total of 78 consecutive patients with suspected mass lesions in the pancreatic head detected by contrast-enhanced multi-detector-row computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging, who underwent EUS-FNA for cytologic and/or histologic confirmation in our institution between June 2012 and April 2017 were enrolled in the current study. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA for mass lesions in the pancreatic head in our series was 61/69 (88.4%), 9/9 (100.0%), 61/61 (100.0%), 9/17 (52.9%), and 70/78 (89.7%), respectively. In univariate analyses, the clinical and endoscopic factors for determining the diagnostic performance of EUS-FNA were the echoendoscope position during needle puncture (long vs. short scope position) and the distance from the echoendoscope to the mass lesion (< 1 cm vs. ≥ 1 cm). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the echoendoscope position during needle puncture was the only independent and significant determining factor for the diagnostic performance of EUS-FNA for mass lesions in the pancreatic head. Conclusion: The echoendoscope position during needle puncture is a determining factor for the diagnostic performance of EUS-FNA for mass lesions in the pancreatic head.
AB - Background: This study aimed to identify the clinical and endoscopic factors that determined the diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for mass lesions in the pancreatic head. Methods: A total of 78 consecutive patients with suspected mass lesions in the pancreatic head detected by contrast-enhanced multi-detector-row computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging, who underwent EUS-FNA for cytologic and/or histologic confirmation in our institution between June 2012 and April 2017 were enrolled in the current study. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA for mass lesions in the pancreatic head in our series was 61/69 (88.4%), 9/9 (100.0%), 61/61 (100.0%), 9/17 (52.9%), and 70/78 (89.7%), respectively. In univariate analyses, the clinical and endoscopic factors for determining the diagnostic performance of EUS-FNA were the echoendoscope position during needle puncture (long vs. short scope position) and the distance from the echoendoscope to the mass lesion (< 1 cm vs. ≥ 1 cm). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the echoendoscope position during needle puncture was the only independent and significant determining factor for the diagnostic performance of EUS-FNA for mass lesions in the pancreatic head. Conclusion: The echoendoscope position during needle puncture is a determining factor for the diagnostic performance of EUS-FNA for mass lesions in the pancreatic head.
KW - Diagnostic performance
KW - Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration
KW - Pancreatic head lesion
KW - Scope position
KW - Sensitivity
KW - specificity
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85178326077
U2 - 10.18528/ijgii230032
DO - 10.18528/ijgii230032
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85178326077
SN - 2636-0012
VL - 12
SP - 163
EP - 168
JO - International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention
JF - International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention
IS - 4
ER -