Abstract
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) has been performed with increasing fre-quency worldwide to improve the low survival rate of conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR). Several studies have shown that among patients who experience in-hospital cardiac arrest, better survival outcomes and neurological outcomes can be expected after ECPR than after CCPR. However, studies have not clearly shown a short-term survival benefit of ECPR for patients who experience out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Favorable outcomes are associated with a shorter low-flow time, an initial shockable rhythm, lower serum lactate levels, higher blood pH, and a lower Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score. Indications for ECPR include young age, witnessed arrest with bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, an initial shockable rhythm, correctable causes such as a cardiac etiology, and no return of spontaneous circulation within 10-20 minutes of CCPR. ECPR is a complex intervention that requires a highly trained team, specialized equipment, and multidisciplinary support within a healthcare system, and it has the risk of several life-threatening complications. Therefore, physicians should carefully select patients for ECPR who can gain the most benefit, instead of applying ECPR indiscriminately.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-9 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Acute and Critical Care |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 29 Feb 2020 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Advanced cardiac life support
- Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
- Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
- Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Role of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver