TY - GEN
T1 - Registration methods for histological slides and ex vivo MRI of prostate
AU - Park, Hyunjin
AU - Kwee, Sandi
AU - Thibault, Gregory P.
AU - Stack, Richard
AU - Sesterhenn, Isabel A.
AU - Potter, Kimberlee
AU - Meyer, Charles R.
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - A methodology for registering histological slides and ex vivo MRI of prostate is proposed. After such registration is performed, spatial correspondence between histology slides and ex vivo MRI is established, thus histological truth can be propagated to the ex vivo MRI space. We employ the well established registration approach based on mutual information (MI) and thin-plate splines (TPS), which is automatic after user's initial placement of control points. Directly registering histology slides onto ex vivo MRI is challenging because 1) it is a difficult 2D (slice) to 3D (volume) registration problem and 2) there is a big difference in information content as histology slides are typically taken at much higher resolution than ex vivo MRI. Here we propose to overcome this challenge by breaking the difficult direct registration task into easier registration sub-tasks. For this purpose, we acquire digital photographs of prostate specimen as it is sectioned, which are referred to as block face photos. First, we register histology slides onto block face photos and then register block face photos onto ex vivo MRI. Results from two registrations tasks are combined to establish registration between histology slides and ex vivo MRI. Before the second registration task, we stack the block face photos into a volume so that registration onto the ex vivo MRI is a more stable 3D (volume) to 3D (volume) registration.
AB - A methodology for registering histological slides and ex vivo MRI of prostate is proposed. After such registration is performed, spatial correspondence between histology slides and ex vivo MRI is established, thus histological truth can be propagated to the ex vivo MRI space. We employ the well established registration approach based on mutual information (MI) and thin-plate splines (TPS), which is automatic after user's initial placement of control points. Directly registering histology slides onto ex vivo MRI is challenging because 1) it is a difficult 2D (slice) to 3D (volume) registration problem and 2) there is a big difference in information content as histology slides are typically taken at much higher resolution than ex vivo MRI. Here we propose to overcome this challenge by breaking the difficult direct registration task into easier registration sub-tasks. For this purpose, we acquire digital photographs of prostate specimen as it is sectioned, which are referred to as block face photos. First, we register histology slides onto block face photos and then register block face photos onto ex vivo MRI. Results from two registrations tasks are combined to establish registration between histology slides and ex vivo MRI. Before the second registration task, we stack the block face photos into a volume so that registration onto the ex vivo MRI is a more stable 3D (volume) to 3D (volume) registration.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/48149114305
U2 - 10.1109/NSSMIC.2007.4436786
DO - 10.1109/NSSMIC.2007.4436786
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:48149114305
SN - 1424409233
SN - 9781424409235
T3 - IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record
SP - 3102
EP - 3104
BT - 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, NSS-MIC
T2 - 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, NSS-MIC
Y2 - 27 October 2007 through 3 November 2007
ER -