Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Randomized phase III trial of irinotecan plus cisplatin compared with paclitaxel plus carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy for ovarian clear cell carcinoma: JGOG3017/GCIG trial

  • Toru Sugiyama
  • , Aikou Okamoto
  • , Takayuki Enomoto
  • , Tetsutaro Hamano
  • , Eriko Aotani
  • , Yasuhisa Terao
  • , Nao Suzuki
  • , Mikio Mikami
  • , Nobuo Yaegashi
  • , Kiyoko Kato
  • , Hiroyuki Yoshikawa
  • , Yoshihito Yokoyama
  • , Hiroshi Tanabe
  • , Koji Nishino
  • , Hiroyuki Nomura
  • , Jae Weon Kim
  • , Byoung Gie Kim
  • , Sandro Pignata
  • , Jerome Alexandre
  • , John Green
  • Seiji Isonishi, Fumitoshi Terauchi, Keiichi Fujiwara, Daisuke Aoki
  • Iwate Medical University
  • The Jikei University School of Medicine
  • Niigata University
  • Kitasato University
  • Kanagawa Institute of Industrial Science and Technology
  • Juntendo University
  • St. Marianna University School of Medicine
  • Tokai University
  • Tohoku University
  • Kyushu University
  • University of Tsukuba
  • Hirosaki University
  • Keio University
  • IRCCS Istituto nazionale tumori Fondazione Giovanni Pascale - Napoli
  • Centre Hospitalier de L'Universite de Montreal
  • University of Liverpool
  • Tokyo Medical University
  • Saitama Medical University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Clear cell carcinoma (CCC) is a rare histologic subtype that demonstrates poor outcomes in epithelial ovarian cancer. The Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group conducted the first randomized phase III, CCC-specific clinical trial that compared irinotecan and cisplatin (CPT-P) with paclitaxel plus carboplatin (TC) in patients with CCC. Patients and Methods: Six hundred sixty-seven patients with stage I to IV CCC of the ovary were randomly assigned to receive irinotecan 60 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 plus cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1 (CPT-P group) every 4 weeks for six cycles or paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 plus carboplatin area under the curve 6.0mg/mL/min on day 1 every 3 weeks for six cycles (TC group). The primary end point was progressionfree survival. Secondary end points were overall survival, overall response rate, and adverse events. Results: Six hundred nineteen patients were clinically and pathologically eligible for evaluation. With a median follow-up of 44.3 months, 2-year progression-free survival rates were 73.0% in the CPT-P group and 77.6% in TC group (hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.58; P =.85). Two-year overall survival rates were 85.5% with CPT-P and 87.4% with TC (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.61; one-sided P =.76). Grade 3/4 anorexia, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and febrile neutropenia occurred more frequently with CPT-P, whereas grade 3/4 leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, peripheral sensory neuropathy, and joint pain occurred more frequently with TC. Conclusion: No significant survival benefit was found for CPT-P. Both regimens were well tolerated, but the toxicity profiles differed significantly. Treatment with existing anticancer agents has limitations to improving the prognosis of CCC.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2881-2887
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume34
Issue number24
DOIs
StatePublished - 20 Aug 2016

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Randomized phase III trial of irinotecan plus cisplatin compared with paclitaxel plus carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy for ovarian clear cell carcinoma: JGOG3017/GCIG trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this