TY - JOUR
T1 - Radiation therapy management in BRCA1/2 carriers diagnosed with early breast cancer
T2 - An international cohort study
AU - Becherini, Carlotta
AU - Blondeaux, Eva
AU - Delucchi, Virginia
AU - Visani, Luca
AU - Kim, Hee Jeong
AU - Coussy, Florence
AU - Bernstein-Molho, Rinat
AU - Di Meglio, Antonio
AU - Hilbers, Florentine S.
AU - Pogoda, Katarzyna
AU - Kwong, Ava
AU - Agostinetto, Elisa
AU - Baten, Adinda
AU - Bajpai, Jyoti
AU - Balmana, Judith
AU - Moore, Halle C.F.
AU - Partridge, Ann H.
AU - Rousset-Jablonski, Christine
AU - Phillips, Kelly Anne
AU - Toss, Angela
AU - Renaud, Tiphaine
AU - Ferrari, Alberta
AU - Peccatori, Fedro A.
AU - Sanchez, Lucas
AU - Paluch-Shimon, Shani
AU - Cui, Wanda
AU - Wong, Stephanie M.
AU - Ryu, Jai Min
AU - Fruscio, Robert
AU - Lee, Minna K.
AU - Vernieri, Claudio
AU - Matikas, Alexios
AU - Couch, Fergus J.
AU - De Marchis, Laura
AU - Dieci, Maria Vittoria
AU - Aguilar-Y-Mendez, Dione
AU - Hwang, Shelley E.
AU - Rozenblit, Mariya
AU - Can Güven, Deniz
AU - Mrinakova, Bela
AU - Harbeck, Nadia
AU - Sanchez-Bayona, Rodrigo
AU - Boni, Luca
AU - Lambertini, Matteo
AU - Meattini, Icro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Author(s)
PY - 2026/6
Y1 - 2026/6
N2 - Background: The oncological safety of breast-conserving surgery followed by radiation therapy (BCS + RT) in young women carrying pathogenic or likely pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants remains debated, with mastectomy (MS) often favoured despite limited comparative real-world evidence. We evaluated survival and recurrence outcomes associated with different loco-regional strategies in a large international cohort of young BRCA carriers. Methods: The BRCA BCY Collaboration (NCT03673306) is a retrospective, multicentre cohort including women aged ≤ 40 years with invasive breast cancer and confirmed germline BRCA1/2 variants treated between 2000 and 2020. Outcomes were compared between patients treated with BCS + RT, MS alone, or MS plus RT (MS + RT). Endpoints were overall survival (OS), breast cancer-free interval (BCFI), and second primary breast cancer events, defined as ipsilateral breast recurrence (IBR) or contralateral breast cancer (CBC). Multivariable Cox models were used for OS and BCFI. Competing-risks models were used for IBR/CBC. Models were adjusted for prespecified prognostic factors, and subgroup analyses were conducted by BRCA gene, stage, and tumour grade. Results: Among 4,837 patients, 1,704 (35.2%) received BCS + RT, 1,488 (30.8%) MS alone, and 1,645 (34.0%) MS + RT. After a median follow-up of 8.2 years (IQR 4.8–12.7), OS did not differ between BCS + RT and MS alone (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.02, 95% CI 0.78–1.34). BCFI was comparable across groups. BCS + RT was associated with a higher risk of second primary breast cancer events compared with MS alone (aHR 1.33, 95% CI 1.07–1.66), particularly in patients with BRCA1 variants and stage III disease. Conclusion: In young BRCA1/2 carriers, BCS + RT was not associated with worse OS compared with MS alone, despite a higher risk of second primary breast events. Differences in second primary breast cancer events should be interpreted cautiously given differences in BRCA testing timing and treatment era across groups. These data support individualised loco-regional management within a multidisciplinary framework.
AB - Background: The oncological safety of breast-conserving surgery followed by radiation therapy (BCS + RT) in young women carrying pathogenic or likely pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants remains debated, with mastectomy (MS) often favoured despite limited comparative real-world evidence. We evaluated survival and recurrence outcomes associated with different loco-regional strategies in a large international cohort of young BRCA carriers. Methods: The BRCA BCY Collaboration (NCT03673306) is a retrospective, multicentre cohort including women aged ≤ 40 years with invasive breast cancer and confirmed germline BRCA1/2 variants treated between 2000 and 2020. Outcomes were compared between patients treated with BCS + RT, MS alone, or MS plus RT (MS + RT). Endpoints were overall survival (OS), breast cancer-free interval (BCFI), and second primary breast cancer events, defined as ipsilateral breast recurrence (IBR) or contralateral breast cancer (CBC). Multivariable Cox models were used for OS and BCFI. Competing-risks models were used for IBR/CBC. Models were adjusted for prespecified prognostic factors, and subgroup analyses were conducted by BRCA gene, stage, and tumour grade. Results: Among 4,837 patients, 1,704 (35.2%) received BCS + RT, 1,488 (30.8%) MS alone, and 1,645 (34.0%) MS + RT. After a median follow-up of 8.2 years (IQR 4.8–12.7), OS did not differ between BCS + RT and MS alone (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.02, 95% CI 0.78–1.34). BCFI was comparable across groups. BCS + RT was associated with a higher risk of second primary breast cancer events compared with MS alone (aHR 1.33, 95% CI 1.07–1.66), particularly in patients with BRCA1 variants and stage III disease. Conclusion: In young BRCA1/2 carriers, BCS + RT was not associated with worse OS compared with MS alone, despite a higher risk of second primary breast events. Differences in second primary breast cancer events should be interpreted cautiously given differences in BRCA testing timing and treatment era across groups. These data support individualised loco-regional management within a multidisciplinary framework.
KW - BRCA
KW - Breast cancer
KW - Breast-conserving surgery
KW - Loco-regional treatment
KW - Mastectomy
KW - Outcomes
KW - Radiotherapy
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105035076710
U2 - 10.1016/j.radonc.2026.111523
DO - 10.1016/j.radonc.2026.111523
M3 - Article
C2 - 41941938
AN - SCOPUS:105035076710
SN - 0167-8140
VL - 219
JO - Radiotherapy and Oncology
JF - Radiotherapy and Oncology
M1 - 111523
ER -