Radiation dose reduction in multidetector CT in fracture evaluation

Jung Woo Yi, Hee Jin Park, So Yeon Lee, Myung Ho Rho, Hyun Pyo Hong, Yoon Jung Choi, Mi Sung Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether multidetector CT with low-dose radiation (low-dose CT) of joints can be useful when evaluating fractures. Methods: Our study included CT scans of 398 patients, 103 shoulder cases, 109 wrist cases, 98 pelvis cases and 88 ankle cases. There were 191 females and 207 males. The low-dose CTs were performed using identical voltage and parameters with the exception of decreased (half of standard dose) tube current. Low-dose and standard-dose images were compared with regards to objective image quality, subjective evaluation of image quality and diagnostic performance for the fractures. Results: There was no significant difference of image noise between standard-dose CT and low-dose CT in every joint (p > 0.05). Each mean value of subjective score did not show significant difference according to the dosage of the CT scan. There were no statistically significant differences in the sensitivity (96-100%), specificity (95.2-100%) or accuracy (97.9-100%) between standard-dose CT and low-dose CT (p values, 0.1336- 1.000). Conclusion: The evaluation of extremities for fractures using low-dose CT can reduce radiation exposure by about 50% compared with standard-dose CT without affecting image quality or diagnostic performance. Advances in knowledge: Low-dose CT of the extremities (shoulder, pelvis, ankle and wrist) can reduce radiation dose by about 50% compared with standard-dose CT and does not significantly affect image quality or diagnostic performance in fracture detection.

Original languageEnglish
Article number20170240
JournalBritish Journal of Radiology
Volume90
Issue number1077
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Radiation dose reduction in multidetector CT in fracture evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this