Pseudobasophilia as an erroneous white blood cell differential count with a discrepancy between automated cell counters: Report of two cases

  • M. Hur
  • , Y. K. Lee
  • , K. M. Lee
  • , H. J. Kim
  • , H. I. Cho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

We report two cases that showed erroneous white blood cell differential counts by automated cell counters. Each case showed an interesting discrepancy of differential count between cell counters, and marked pseudobasophilia was observed by one of the two counters. The first patient was a 44-year-old female who suffered from multiple myeloma for more than one and a half years. Increased myeloma cells (43%) in peripheral blood were counted as basophils by the ADVIA 120, and as monocytes by SE-9000, respectively. The second patient was a 72-year-old female diagnosed as having chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Dysgranulopoietic neutrophils (50%) and monocytes (31%) were increased in the peripheral blood. Dysgranulopoietic neutrophils were counted as basophils by STKS. In contrast, about half of the increased monocytes were counted as neutrophils by the ADVIA 120. These interesting findings highlight the importance of microscopic examination of the blood film in routine laboratory practice, and automated cell counters, especially for the hematologic patients, cannot completely substitute for it. These results also imply that at least some subpopulations with different membrane or cytoplasmic properties may exist even in the similarly classified cells.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)287-290
Number of pages4
JournalClinical and Laboratory Haematology
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2004

Keywords

  • Automated counter
  • Differential count
  • Discrepancy
  • Pseudobasophilia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pseudobasophilia as an erroneous white blood cell differential count with a discrepancy between automated cell counters: Report of two cases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this