TY - JOUR
T1 - Proteomic-Based Machine Learning Analysis Reveals PYGB as a Novel Immunohistochemical Biomarker to Distinguish Inverted Urothelial Papilloma From Low-Grade Papillary Urothelial Carcinoma With Inverted Growth
AU - Jung, Minsun
AU - Lee, Cheol
AU - Han, Dohyun
AU - Kim, Kwangsoo
AU - Yang, Sunah
AU - Nikas, Ilias P.
AU - Moon, Kyung Chul
AU - Kim, Hyeyoon
AU - Song, Min Ji
AU - Kim, Bohyun
AU - Lee, Hyebin
AU - Ryu, Han Suk
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Jung, Lee, Han, Kim, Yang, Nikas, Moon, Kim, Song, Kim, Lee and Ryu.
PY - 2022/3/24
Y1 - 2022/3/24
N2 - Background: The molecular biology of inverted urothelial papilloma (IUP) as a precursor disease of urothelial carcinoma is poorly understood. Furthermore, the overlapping histology between IUP and papillary urothelial carcinoma (PUC) with inverted growth is a diagnostic pitfall leading to frequent misdiagnoses. Methods: To identify the oncologic significance of IUP and discover a novel biomarker for its diagnosis, we employed mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis of IUP, PUC, and normal urothelium (NU). Machine learning analysis shortlisted candidate proteins, while subsequent immunohistochemical validation was performed in an independent sample cohort. Results: From the overall proteomic landscape, we found divergent ‘NU-like’ (low-risk) and ‘PUC-like’ (high-risk) signatures in IUP. The latter were characterized by altered metabolism, biosynthesis, and cell–cell interaction functions, indicating oncologic significance. Further machine learning-based analysis revealed SERPINH1, PKP2, and PYGB as potential diagnostic biomarkers discriminating IUP from PUC. The immunohistochemical validation confirmed PYGB as a specific biomarker to distinguish between IUP and PUC with inverted growth. Conclusion: In conclusion, we suggest PYGB as a promising immunohistochemical marker for IUP diagnosis in routine practice.
AB - Background: The molecular biology of inverted urothelial papilloma (IUP) as a precursor disease of urothelial carcinoma is poorly understood. Furthermore, the overlapping histology between IUP and papillary urothelial carcinoma (PUC) with inverted growth is a diagnostic pitfall leading to frequent misdiagnoses. Methods: To identify the oncologic significance of IUP and discover a novel biomarker for its diagnosis, we employed mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis of IUP, PUC, and normal urothelium (NU). Machine learning analysis shortlisted candidate proteins, while subsequent immunohistochemical validation was performed in an independent sample cohort. Results: From the overall proteomic landscape, we found divergent ‘NU-like’ (low-risk) and ‘PUC-like’ (high-risk) signatures in IUP. The latter were characterized by altered metabolism, biosynthesis, and cell–cell interaction functions, indicating oncologic significance. Further machine learning-based analysis revealed SERPINH1, PKP2, and PYGB as potential diagnostic biomarkers discriminating IUP from PUC. The immunohistochemical validation confirmed PYGB as a specific biomarker to distinguish between IUP and PUC with inverted growth. Conclusion: In conclusion, we suggest PYGB as a promising immunohistochemical marker for IUP diagnosis in routine practice.
KW - biomarkers
KW - differential diagnosis
KW - immunohistochemistry
KW - inverted urothelial papilloma
KW - machine learning analysis
KW - papillary urothelial carcinoma
KW - tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS)
KW - transitional cell carcinoma (TCC)
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85128173754
U2 - 10.3389/fonc.2022.841398
DO - 10.3389/fonc.2022.841398
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85128173754
SN - 2234-943X
VL - 12
JO - Frontiers in Oncology
JF - Frontiers in Oncology
M1 - 841398
ER -