TY - JOUR
T1 - Prophylactic Central Neck Dissection Might Not Be Necessary in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
T2 - Analysis of 11,569 Cases from a Single Institution
AU - Kim, Seo Ki
AU - Woo, Jung Woo
AU - Lee, Jun Ho
AU - Park, Inhye
AU - Choe, Jun Ho
AU - Kim, Jung Han
AU - Kim, Jee Soo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 American College of Surgeons.
PY - 2016/5/1
Y1 - 2016/5/1
N2 - Background The benefits of prophylactic central neck dissection (pCND) remain controversial in clinically node-negative (cN0) papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical impact of pCND with a large group of cN0 PTC patients. Study Design A total of 11,569 cN0 PTC patients who underwent thyroidectomy between January 1997 and June 2015 were investigated. Using Cox multivariate analysis, the prognostic impact of pCND was assessed using subset analyses according to various clinicopathologic conditions. Using propensity score matching, various surgical morbidities were assessed under adjusted conditions. Results Of 11,569 cN0 PTC patients, 8,735 (75.5%) underwent pCND. Prophylactic CND did not significantly decrease the risk of locoregional recurrence in cN0 PTC patients (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.874; p = 0.392). In addition, pCND did not significantly decrease the risk of locoregional recurrence in various surgical extents (lobectomy and ipsilateral pCND [adjusted HR = 0.636; p = 0.131], total thyroidectomy and ipsilateral pCND [adjusted HR = 0.775; p = 0.164], and total thyroidectomy and bilateral pCND [adjusted HR = 1.041; p = 0.821]). However, surgical morbidities, such as temporary vocal cord palsy (5.6% vs 2.5%; p = 0.001), temporary hypoparathyroidism (30.8% vs 16.7%; p < 0.001), and permanent hypoparathyroidism (3.5% vs 1.7%; p < 0.001) were significantly more frequent in the pCND(+) group. Conclusions Given the lack of proven benefits and the clear evidence of morbidities, pCND cannot be recommended as a routine procedure. We suggest that CND be reserved for therapeutic situations.
AB - Background The benefits of prophylactic central neck dissection (pCND) remain controversial in clinically node-negative (cN0) papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical impact of pCND with a large group of cN0 PTC patients. Study Design A total of 11,569 cN0 PTC patients who underwent thyroidectomy between January 1997 and June 2015 were investigated. Using Cox multivariate analysis, the prognostic impact of pCND was assessed using subset analyses according to various clinicopathologic conditions. Using propensity score matching, various surgical morbidities were assessed under adjusted conditions. Results Of 11,569 cN0 PTC patients, 8,735 (75.5%) underwent pCND. Prophylactic CND did not significantly decrease the risk of locoregional recurrence in cN0 PTC patients (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.874; p = 0.392). In addition, pCND did not significantly decrease the risk of locoregional recurrence in various surgical extents (lobectomy and ipsilateral pCND [adjusted HR = 0.636; p = 0.131], total thyroidectomy and ipsilateral pCND [adjusted HR = 0.775; p = 0.164], and total thyroidectomy and bilateral pCND [adjusted HR = 1.041; p = 0.821]). However, surgical morbidities, such as temporary vocal cord palsy (5.6% vs 2.5%; p = 0.001), temporary hypoparathyroidism (30.8% vs 16.7%; p < 0.001), and permanent hypoparathyroidism (3.5% vs 1.7%; p < 0.001) were significantly more frequent in the pCND(+) group. Conclusions Given the lack of proven benefits and the clear evidence of morbidities, pCND cannot be recommended as a routine procedure. We suggest that CND be reserved for therapeutic situations.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84964523421
U2 - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.02.001
DO - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.02.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 27113516
AN - SCOPUS:84964523421
SN - 1072-7515
VL - 222
SP - 853
EP - 864
JO - Journal of the American College of Surgeons
JF - Journal of the American College of Surgeons
IS - 5
ER -