Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Prognostic Value of Ambulatory Status at Transplant in Older Heart Transplant Recipients: Implications for Organ Allocation Policy

  • Junho Hyun
  • , Jong Chan Youn
  • , Jung Ae Hong
  • , Darae Kim
  • , Jae Joong Kim
  • , Myoung Soo Kim
  • , Jaewon Oh
  • , Jin Jin Kim
  • , Mi Hyang Jung
  • , In Cheol Kim
  • , Sang Eun Lee
  • , Jin Joo Park
  • , Min Seok Kim
  • , Sung Ho Jung
  • , Hyun Jai Cho
  • , Hae Young Lee
  • , Seok Min Kang
  • , Dong Ju Choi
  • , Jon A. Kobashigawa
  • , Josef Stehlik
  • Jin Oh Choi
  • University of Ulsan
  • The Catholic University of Korea
  • Yonsei University
  • Keimyung University
  • Seoul National University
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
  • University of Utah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Shortage of organ donors in the Republic of Korea has become a major problem. To address this, it has been questioned whether heart transplant (HTx) allocation should be modified to reduce priority of older patients. We aimed to evaluate post-HTx outcomes according to recipient age and specific pre-HTx conditions using a nationwide prospective cohort. Methods: We analyzed clinical characteristics of 628 patients from the Korean Organ Transplant Registry who received HTx from January 2015 to December 2020. Enrolled recipients were divided into three groups according to age. We also included comorbidities including ambulatory status. Non-ambulatory status was defined as pre-HTx support with either extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, continuous renal replacement therapy, or mechanical ventilation. Results: Of the 628 patients, 195 were < 50 years, 322 were 50–64 years and 111 were ≥ 65 years at transplant. Four hundred nine (65.1%) were ambulatory and 219 (34.9%) were non-ambulatory. Older recipients tended to have more comorbidities, ischemic cardiomyopathy, and received older donors. Post-HTx survival was significantly lower in older recipients (P = 0.025) and recipients with non-ambulatory status (P < 0.001). However, in contrast to non-ambulatory recipients who showed significant survival differences according to the recipient’s age (P = 0.004), ambulatory recipients showed comparable outcomes (P = 0.465). Conclusion: Our results do not support use of age alone as an allocation criterion. Transplant candidate age in combination with some comorbidities such as non-ambulatory status may identify patients at a sufficiently elevated risk at which suitability of HTx should be reconsidered.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere14
JournalJournal of Korean Medical Science
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2025

Keywords

  • Age
  • Ambulatory Status
  • Heart Transplantation
  • Outcome
  • Survival

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prognostic Value of Ambulatory Status at Transplant in Older Heart Transplant Recipients: Implications for Organ Allocation Policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this