TY - JOUR
T1 - Prognostic Implications of Microvascular Resistance Reserve in Symptomatic Patients With Intermediate Coronary Stenosis
AU - Lee, Seung Hun
AU - Choi, Ki Hong
AU - Hong, David
AU - Shin, Doosup
AU - Joh, Hyun Sung
AU - Kim, Hyun Kuk
AU - Park, Taek Kyu
AU - Yang, Jeong Hoon
AU - Song, Young Bin
AU - Hahn, Joo Yong
AU - Choi, Seung Hyuk
AU - Gwon, Hyeon Cheol
AU - Lee, Joo Myung
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation
PY - 2024/3/25
Y1 - 2024/3/25
N2 - Background: Microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) is a novel index reflecting coronary microcirculatory function, irrespective of epicardial coronary artery stenosis. There is limited evidence regarding whether MRR can be an independent prognostic tool in patients with stable ischemic heart disease (IHD). Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes according to MRR in patients with stable IHD accompanied with or without significant epicardial coronary artery stenosis. Methods: The present study included 547 consecutive patients undergoing systematic echocardiographic and invasive physiological assessment for suspected stable IHD. Significant epicardial coronary artery stenosis was defined as fractional flow reserve (FFR) ≤0.80. Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) was defined as MRR ≤3.0. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and admission for heart failure. Results: Among the study group, 172 patients (31.4%) had FFR ≤0.80, and 200 patients (36.6%) had CMD defined by MRR ≤3.0. MRR showed no significant correlation with FFR (R = −0.031; P = 0.469), but it was significantly correlated with the index of microcirculatory resistance (R = −0.353; P < 0.001), N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide (R = −0.296; P < 0.001), left ventricular filling pressure (E/e′ ratio) (R = −0.224; P < 0.001), and diastolic dysfunction grade (P < 0.001). During a median follow-up period of 3.3 years (Q1-Q3: 2.0-4.5 years), MRR was significantly associated with MACE risk (HR: 1.23 per 1-U decrease; 95% CI: 1.12-1.36; P < 0.001). CMD defined by MRR ≤3.0 was associated with an increased MACE risk for both FFR >0.80 (41.0% vs 26.0%; adjusted HR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.07-2.35; P = 0.021) and FFR ≤0.80 (34.7% vs 14.8%; adjusted HR: 2.32; 95% CI: 1.12-4.82; P = 0.024). Conclusions: Decreased MRR was associated with the presence of cardiac diastolic dysfunction as well as increased left ventricular filling pressure. The presence of CMD defined by MRR was independently associated with the risk for a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and admission for heart failure in patients with stable IHD, irrespective of significant epicardial coronary artery stenosis.
AB - Background: Microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) is a novel index reflecting coronary microcirculatory function, irrespective of epicardial coronary artery stenosis. There is limited evidence regarding whether MRR can be an independent prognostic tool in patients with stable ischemic heart disease (IHD). Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes according to MRR in patients with stable IHD accompanied with or without significant epicardial coronary artery stenosis. Methods: The present study included 547 consecutive patients undergoing systematic echocardiographic and invasive physiological assessment for suspected stable IHD. Significant epicardial coronary artery stenosis was defined as fractional flow reserve (FFR) ≤0.80. Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) was defined as MRR ≤3.0. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and admission for heart failure. Results: Among the study group, 172 patients (31.4%) had FFR ≤0.80, and 200 patients (36.6%) had CMD defined by MRR ≤3.0. MRR showed no significant correlation with FFR (R = −0.031; P = 0.469), but it was significantly correlated with the index of microcirculatory resistance (R = −0.353; P < 0.001), N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide (R = −0.296; P < 0.001), left ventricular filling pressure (E/e′ ratio) (R = −0.224; P < 0.001), and diastolic dysfunction grade (P < 0.001). During a median follow-up period of 3.3 years (Q1-Q3: 2.0-4.5 years), MRR was significantly associated with MACE risk (HR: 1.23 per 1-U decrease; 95% CI: 1.12-1.36; P < 0.001). CMD defined by MRR ≤3.0 was associated with an increased MACE risk for both FFR >0.80 (41.0% vs 26.0%; adjusted HR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.07-2.35; P = 0.021) and FFR ≤0.80 (34.7% vs 14.8%; adjusted HR: 2.32; 95% CI: 1.12-4.82; P = 0.024). Conclusions: Decreased MRR was associated with the presence of cardiac diastolic dysfunction as well as increased left ventricular filling pressure. The presence of CMD defined by MRR was independently associated with the risk for a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and admission for heart failure in patients with stable IHD, irrespective of significant epicardial coronary artery stenosis.
KW - coronary flow reserve
KW - coronary microvascular dysfunction
KW - index of microcirculatory resistance
KW - microvascular resistance reserve
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85187680866
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.01.008
DO - 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.01.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 38538174
AN - SCOPUS:85187680866
SN - 1936-8798
VL - 17
SP - 786
EP - 797
JO - JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
JF - JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
IS - 6
ER -