Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Prognostic Implication of Platelet Reactivity According to Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction Status in Patients Treated With Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: Analysis of the PTRG-DES Consortium

  • Donghoon Han
  • , Sun Hwa Kim
  • , Dong Geum Shin
  • , Min Kyung Kang
  • , Seonghoon Choi
  • , Namho Lee
  • , Byeong Keuk Kim
  • , Hyung Joon Joo
  • , Kiyuk Chang
  • , Yongwhi Park
  • , Young Bin Song
  • , Sung Gyun Ahn
  • , Jung Won Suh
  • , Sang Yeub Lee
  • , Ae Young Her
  • , Young Hoon Jeong
  • , Hyo Soo Kim
  • , Moo Hyun Kim
  • , Do Sun Lim
  • , Eun Seok Shin
  • Jung Rae Cho
  • Hallym University
  • Seoul National University
  • Yonsei University
  • Korea University
  • The Catholic University of Korea
  • Gyeongsang National University
  • Wonju Severance Christian Hospital
  • Chung-Ang University
  • Kangwon National University
  • Dong-A University
  • University of Ulsan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Coronary artery disease patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) often exhibit reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, the impact of LV dysfunction status in conjunction with platelet reactivity on clinical outcomes has not been previously investigated. Methods: From the multicenter PTRG-DES (Platelet function and genoType-Related long-term prognosis in DES-treated patients) consortium, the patients were classified as preserved-EF (PEF: LVEF > 50%) and reduced-EF (REF: LVEF< 5 0%) group by echocardiography. Platelet reactivity was measured using VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and high platelet reactivity (HPR) was defined as PRU > 252. The major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) were a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and stroke at 5 years after PCI. Major bleeding was defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding types 3-5. Results: A total of 13,160 patients from PTRG-DES, 9,319 (79.6%) patients with the results of both PRU and LVEF were analyzed. The incidence of MACCE and major bleeding was higher in REF group as compared with PEF group (MACCEs: hazard ratio [HR] 2.17, P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.85-2.55; major bleeding: HR 1.78, P < 0.001, 95% CI 1.39-2.78). The highest rate of MACCEs was found in patients with REF and HPR, and the difference between the groups was statistically significant (HR 3.14 in REF(+)/HPR(+) vs. PEF(+)/HPR(-) group, P < 0.01, 95% CI 2.51-3.91). The frequency of major bleeding was not associated with the HPR in either group. Conclusion: LV dysfunction was associated with an increased incidence of MACCEs and major bleeding in patients who underwent PCI. The HPR status further exhibited significant increase of MACCEs in patients with LV dysfunction in a large, real-world registry. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere27
JournalJournal of Korean Medical Science
Volume39
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Clinical Outcome
  • Drug-Eluting Stent
  • Heart Failure
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • Platelet Reactivity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prognostic Implication of Platelet Reactivity According to Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction Status in Patients Treated With Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: Analysis of the PTRG-DES Consortium'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this