Prognostic factors of hemifacial spasm after microvascular decompression

Hong Rae Kim, Deok Joo Rhee, Doo Sik Kong, Kwan Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

47 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: The factors that influence the prognosis of patients with hemifacial spasm (HFS) treated by microvascular decompression (MVD) have not been definitely established. We report a prospective study evaluating the prognostic factors in patients undergoing MVD for HFS. Methods: From January 2004 to September 2006, the authors prospectively studied a series of 293 patients who underwent MVD for HFS. We prospectively analyzed a number of variables in order to evaluate the predictive value of independent variables for the prognosis of patients undergoing MVD. The patients were followed-up at regular intervals and divided into as cured and unsatisfactory groups based on symptom relief. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed using logistic regression models. Results: A total 273 of 293 (94.2%) patients achieved symptom relief within one year after the operation. Intraoperatively, the indentation of the root exit zone was observed in 259 (88.5%) patients. Uni- and multivariate analyses revealed that the symptoms at postoperative 3 months (p<0.001) and indentation of the root exit zone (p=0.036) were associated with good outcomes. Conclusion: The intraoperative finding of root exit zone indentation will help physicians determine the prognosis in patients with HFS. To predict the prognosis of HFS, a regular follow-up period of at least 3 months following MVD should be required.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)336-340
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
Volume45
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Chronology
  • Hemifacial spasm
  • Microvascular decompression
  • Prognosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prognostic factors of hemifacial spasm after microvascular decompression'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this