Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with frequent premature ventricular complexes: The ABC-VT risk score

  • Aleksandr Voskoboinik
  • , Alexios Hadjis
  • , Christina Alhede
  • , Sung Il Im
  • , Hansu Park
  • , Joshua Moss
  • , Gregory M. Marcus
  • , Henry Hsia
  • , Byron Lee
  • , Zian Tseng
  • , Randall Lee
  • , Melvin Scheinman
  • , Vasanth Vedantham
  • , Eric Vittinghoff
  • , Kyoung Min Park
  • , Edward P. Gerstenfeld

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: No independently validated score currently exists for risk stratification of patients with frequent premature ventricular complexes (PVCs). Objectives: The purpose of this study was to develop a risk score to predict adverse events in patients with frequent PVCs. Methods: We analyzed consecutive patients between 2012 and 2017 undergoing 14-day continuous monitoring with frequent PVCs (>5%) and concurrent echocardiography. We performed binary logistic regression to determine multivariate predictors of adverse left ventricular remodeling (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <45% or left ventricular end-diastolic volume index >75 mL/m2). A risk score was created using the log(odds ratio (OR)) of these predictors and validated prospectively to determine the risk of future adverse events in those with baseline LVEF >45%. An adverse event was defined as LVEF decline by 10%, heart failure hospitalization, or cardiovascular mortality. Two validation cohorts were used: follow-up from the original derivation cohort (cohort 1) and an independent Korean PVC registry (cohort 2). Results: The derivation cohort comprised 206 patients with a mean PVC burden of 11.6% ± 6.2% and considerable daily fluctuation (minimum burden 7.3% ± 6.2% vs maximum 17.9% ± 8.0%). Independent predictors of adverse remodeling were as follows: superiorly directed PVC axis (OR 2.7; 1 point), PVC burden 10%–20% (OR 3.5; 2 points) and >20% (OR 4.4; 3 points), PVC coupling interval >500 ms (OR 4.7; 4 points), nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (OR 5.3; 4 points), which form the ABC-VT risk score. This score predicted future adverse events in both validation cohorts: cohort 1, hazard ratio 1.43; 95% confidence interval 1.19–1.73; P < .001 and cohort 2, hazard ratio 1.22; 95% confidence interval 1.05–1.42; P = .01. Conclusion: The ABC-VT score is a simple tool that predicts adverse left ventricular remodeling and future clinical deterioration in patients with frequent PVCs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1066-1074
Number of pages9
JournalHeart Rhythm
Volume17
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Cardiomyopathy
  • Left ventricular remodeling
  • Premature ventricular complexes
  • Risk score
  • Ventricular tachycardia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with frequent premature ventricular complexes: The ABC-VT risk score'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this