TY - JOUR
T1 - Physiological Severity of Coronary Artery Stenosis Depends on the Amount of Myocardial Mass Subtended by the Coronary Artery
AU - Kim, Hyung Yoon
AU - Lim, Hong Seok
AU - Doh, Joon Hyung
AU - Nam, Chang Wook
AU - Shin, Eun Seok
AU - Koo, Bon Kwon
AU - Yoon, Myeong Ho
AU - Tahk, Seung Jea
AU - Kang, Doo Kyoung
AU - Song, Young Bin
AU - Hahn, Joo Yong
AU - Choi, Seung Hyuk
AU - Gwon, Hyeon Cheol
AU - Lee, Sang Hoon
AU - Kim, Eun Kyoung
AU - Kim, Sung Mok
AU - Choe, Yeonhyeon
AU - Choi, Jin Ho
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation
PY - 2016/8/8
Y1 - 2016/8/8
N2 - Objectives This study investigated the role of fractional myocardial mass (FMM), a vessel-specific myocardial mass, in the evaluation of physiological severity of stenosis. Using computed tomography angiography, the study investigated fractional myocardial mass, a concept of myocardial mass subtended by specific vessel, which could reduce anatomical-physiological mismatch. Background Discordance between anatomical stenosis and physiological severity is common but remains poorly understood. Methods This multicenter study enrolled 463 patients with 724 lesions, who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement. FMM was assessed by allometric scaling analysis of arterial tree length and myocardial mass from CCTA. Results FFR <0.80, a criteria for vessel-specific physiological stenosis, was found in 281 vessels (39%). FMM decreased consistently according to the vessel downstream (p < 0.001, all). The frequency of FFR <0.80 increased in proportion to FMM and inverse proportion to angiographic minimal luminal diameter (MLD) (p < 0.001). In per-vessel analysis, FMM per MLD (FMM/MLD) showed good correlation with FFR (r = 0.61) and was superior to diameter stenosis (DS) for FFR <0.80 by receiver operating characteristic and reclassification analysis (C-statistics = 0.84 versus 0.74, net reclassification improvement [NRI] = 0.63, integrated discrimination improvement [IDI] = 0.18; p < 0.001, all). The optimal cutoff of FMM/MLD was 29 g/mm, with sensitivity = 75%, specificity = 77%, positive predictive value = 68%, negative predictive value = 83%, and accuracy = 77%. Addition of FMM/MLD to DS could further discriminate vessels with FFR <0.80 (C-statistic = 0.86 vs. 0.84, NRI = 0.34, IDI = 0.03; p < 0.005, all). In per-range classification analysis, agreement between FFR and FMM/MLD maintained >80% when the severity of disease was away from cutoff. Conclusions FMM/MLD could find physiological severity of coronary artery with higher accuracy than anatomical stenosis. FMM may explain the anatomical-physiological discordance.
AB - Objectives This study investigated the role of fractional myocardial mass (FMM), a vessel-specific myocardial mass, in the evaluation of physiological severity of stenosis. Using computed tomography angiography, the study investigated fractional myocardial mass, a concept of myocardial mass subtended by specific vessel, which could reduce anatomical-physiological mismatch. Background Discordance between anatomical stenosis and physiological severity is common but remains poorly understood. Methods This multicenter study enrolled 463 patients with 724 lesions, who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement. FMM was assessed by allometric scaling analysis of arterial tree length and myocardial mass from CCTA. Results FFR <0.80, a criteria for vessel-specific physiological stenosis, was found in 281 vessels (39%). FMM decreased consistently according to the vessel downstream (p < 0.001, all). The frequency of FFR <0.80 increased in proportion to FMM and inverse proportion to angiographic minimal luminal diameter (MLD) (p < 0.001). In per-vessel analysis, FMM per MLD (FMM/MLD) showed good correlation with FFR (r = 0.61) and was superior to diameter stenosis (DS) for FFR <0.80 by receiver operating characteristic and reclassification analysis (C-statistics = 0.84 versus 0.74, net reclassification improvement [NRI] = 0.63, integrated discrimination improvement [IDI] = 0.18; p < 0.001, all). The optimal cutoff of FMM/MLD was 29 g/mm, with sensitivity = 75%, specificity = 77%, positive predictive value = 68%, negative predictive value = 83%, and accuracy = 77%. Addition of FMM/MLD to DS could further discriminate vessels with FFR <0.80 (C-statistic = 0.86 vs. 0.84, NRI = 0.34, IDI = 0.03; p < 0.005, all). In per-range classification analysis, agreement between FFR and FMM/MLD maintained >80% when the severity of disease was away from cutoff. Conclusions FMM/MLD could find physiological severity of coronary artery with higher accuracy than anatomical stenosis. FMM may explain the anatomical-physiological discordance.
KW - anatomical-physiological discordance
KW - coronary artery physiology
KW - fractional flow reserve
KW - fractional myocardial mass
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84978920030
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.04.008
DO - 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.04.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 27423225
AN - SCOPUS:84978920030
SN - 1936-8798
VL - 9
SP - 1548
EP - 1560
JO - JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
JF - JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
IS - 15
ER -