Phase III, randomised trial of avelumab versus physician's choice of chemotherapy as third-line treatment of patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer: Primary analysis of JAVELIN Gastric 300

  • Y. J. Bang
  • , E. Yañez Ruiz
  • , E. Van Cutsem
  • , K. W. Lee
  • , L. Wyrwicz
  • , M. Schenker
  • , M. Alsina
  • , M. H. Ryu
  • , H. C. Chung
  • , L. Evesque
  • , S. E. Al-Batran
  • , S. H. Park
  • , M. Lichinitser
  • , N. Boku
  • , M. H. Moehler
  • , J. Hong
  • , H. Xiong
  • , R. Hallwachs
  • , I. Conti
  • , J. Taieb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: There currently are no internationally recognised treatment guidelines for patients with advanced gastric cancer/ gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC) in whom two prior lines of therapy have failed. The randomised, phase III JAVELIN Gastric 300 trial compared avelumab versus physician's choice of chemotherapy as third-line therapy in patients with advanced GC/GEJC. Patients and methods: Patients with unresectable, recurrent, locally advanced, or metastatic GC/GEJC were recruited at 147 sites globally. All patients were randomised to receive either avelumab 10 mg/kg by intravenous infusion every 2 weeks or physician's choice of chemotherapy (paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 or irinotecan 150 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15, each of a 4-week treatment cycle); patients ineligible for chemotherapy received best supportive care. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. Results: A total of 371 patients were randomised. The trial did not meet its primary end point of improving OS {median, 4.6 versus 5.0 months; hazard ratio (HR)¼1.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9-1.4]; P ¼ 0.81} or the secondary end points of PFS [median, 1.4 versus 2.7 months; HR¼1.73 (95% CI 1.4-2.2); P > 0.99] or ORR (2.2% versus 4.3%) in the avelumab versus chemotherapy arms, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 90 patients (48.9%) and 131 patients (74.0%) in the avelumab and chemotherapy arms, respectively. Grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 17 patients (9.2%) in the avelumab arm and in 56 patients (31.6%) in the chemotherapy arm. Conclusions: Treatment of patients with GC/GEJC with single-agent avelumab in the third-line setting did not result in an improvement in OS or PFS compared with chemotherapy. Avelumab showed a more manageable safety profile than chemotherapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2052-2060
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Oncology
Volume29
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2018

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Avelumab
  • Chemotherapy
  • Gastric cancer
  • Gastro-oesophageal junction cancer
  • PD-L1
  • Phase III

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Phase III, randomised trial of avelumab versus physician's choice of chemotherapy as third-line treatment of patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer: Primary analysis of JAVELIN Gastric 300'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this