Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Phase III open-label randomized study of cytarabine in combination with amonafide L-malate or daunorubicin as induction therapy for patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia

  • Richard M. Stone
  • , Emanuele Mazzola
  • , Donna Neuberg
  • , Steven L. Allen
  • , Arnaud Pigneux
  • , Robert K. Stuart
  • , Meir Wetzler
  • , David Rizzieri
  • , Harry P. Erba
  • , Lloyd Damon
  • , Jun Ho Jang
  • , Martin S. Tallman
  • , Krzysztof Warzocha
  • , Tamás Masszi
  • , Mikkael A. Sekeres
  • , Miklos Egyed
  • , Heinz August Horst
  • , Dominik Selleslag
  • , Scott R. Solomon
  • , Parameswaran Venugopal
  • Ante S. Lundberg, Bayard Powell
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
  • Antisoma
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • Hôpital Haut-Lévêque
  • Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell
  • Medical University of South Carolina
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • University of California at San Francisco
  • Roswell Park Cancer Institute
  • Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion
  • Szent Istvan and Szent Laszlo Corporate Hospital
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • Kaposi Mor County Teaching Hospital
  • University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein
  • General Hospital St. Jan
  • Northside Hospital
  • Rush University Medical Center
  • Duke University
  • Wake Forest University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML), defined as AML arising after a prior myelodysplastic syndrome or after antineoplastic therapy, responds poorly to current therapies. It is often associated with adverse karyotypic abnormalities and overexpression of proteins that mediate drug resistance. We performed a phase III trial to determine whether induction therapy with cytarabine and amonafide L-malate, a DNA intercalator and non-ATP-dependent topoisomerase II inhibitor that evades drug resistance mechanisms, yielded a superior complete remission rate than standard therapy with cytarabine and daunorubicin in sAML. Patients and Methods Patients with previously untreated sAML were randomly assigned at a one-to-one ratio to cytarabine 200 mg/m2 continuous intravenous (IV) infusion once per day on days 1 to 7 plus either amonafide 600 mg/m2 IV over 4 hours on days 1 to 5 (A + C arm) or daunorubicin 45 mg/m2 IV over 30 minutes once per day on days 1 to 3 (D + C arm). Results The complete remission (CR) rate was 46% (99 of 216 patients) in A + C arm and 45% (97 of 217 patients) in D + C arm (P = .81). The 30- and 60-day mortality rates were 19% and 28% in A +C arm and 13% and 21% in D + C arm, respectively. Conclusion Induction treatment with A + C did not improve the CR rate compared with D + C in patients with sAML.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1252-1257
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume33
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 20 Mar 2015

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Phase III open-label randomized study of cytarabine in combination with amonafide L-malate or daunorubicin as induction therapy for patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this