Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Pembrolizumab plus Ipilimumab or Placebo for Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer with PDL1 Tumor Proportion Score ‡ 50%: Randomized, Double-Blind Phase III KEYNOTE-598 Study

  • KEYNOTE-598 Investigators
  • Chris O'Brien Lifehouse
  • Yildirim Beyazit Universitesi
  • Maternity and Children's University Hospital
  • University of Ulsan
  • Trakya University
  • Marmara University
  • Orlandi-Oncología
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Hospital of Le Mans
  • Mahidol University
  • McGill University
  • University of Manchester
  • Veszprém Megyei Tüdőgyógyintézet Farkasgyepű
  • China Medical University Taichung
  • Ohio State University
  • Merck
  • German Center of Lung Research

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

PURPOSE Pembrolizumab monotherapy is standard first-line therapy for metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) $ 50% without actionable driver mutations. It is not known whether adding ipilimumab to pembrolizumab improves efficacy over pembrolizumab alone in this population. METHODS In the randomized, double-blind, phase III KEYNOTE-598 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03302234), eligible patients with previously untreated metastatic NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS $ 50% and no sensitizing EGFR or ALK aberrations were randomly allocated 1:1 to ipilimumab 1 mg/kg or placebo every 6 weeks for up to 18 doses; all participants received pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks for up to 35 doses. Primary end points were overall survival and progression-free survival. RESULTS Of the 568 participants, 284 were randomly allocated to each group. Median overall survival was 21.4 months for pembrolizumab-ipilimumab versus 21.9 months for pembrolizumab-placebo (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.37; P 5 .74). Median progression-free survival was 8.2 months for pembrolizumab-ipilimumab versus 8.4 months for pembrolizumab-placebo (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.30; P 5 .72). Grade 3-5 adverse events occurred in 62.4% of pembrolizumab-ipilimumab recipients versus 50.2% of pembrolizumab-placebo recipients and led to death in 13.1% versus 7.5%. The external data and safety monitoring committee recommended that the study be stopped for futility and that participants discontinue ipilimumab and placebo. CONCLUSION Adding ipilimumab to pembrolizumab does not improve efficacy and is associated with greater toxicity than pembrolizumab monotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS $ 50% and no targetable EGFR or ALK aberrations. These data do not support use of pembrolizumab-ipilimumab in place of pembrolizumab monotherapy in this population.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2327-2338
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume39
Issue number21
DOIs
StatePublished - 20 Jul 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pembrolizumab plus Ipilimumab or Placebo for Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer with PDL1 Tumor Proportion Score ‡ 50%: Randomized, Double-Blind Phase III KEYNOTE-598 Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this