Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus standard of care chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: Asian subgroup analysis of KEYNOTE-062

  • Hironaga Satake
  • , Keun Wook Lee
  • , Hyun Cheol Chung
  • , Jeeyun Lee
  • , Kensei Yamaguchi
  • , Jen Shi Chen
  • , Takaki Yoshikawa
  • , Kenji Amagai
  • , Kun Huei Yeh
  • , Masahiro Goto
  • , Yee Chao
  • , Ka On Lam
  • , Shi Rong Han
  • , Shinichi Shiratori
  • , Sukrut Shah
  • , Kohei Shitara
  • Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital
  • Seoul National University
  • Yonsei University
  • Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
  • National Cancer Center Japan
  • Ibaraki Prefectural Central Hospital
  • National Taiwan University
  • Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University
  • Veterans General Hospital-Taipei
  • The University of Hong Kong
  • Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
  • Merck
  • Nagoya University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: First-line pembrolizumab with/without chemotherapy versus chemotherapy was evaluated in programmed death ligand 1 combined positive score ≥1, locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic gastric cancer/gastrooesophageal junction cancer in the KEYNOTE-062 study. We present results for patients enrolled in Asia. Methods: Eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine) or placebo plus chemotherapy Q3W. End points included overall survival (primary) in combined positive score ≥1 and combined positive score ≥10 populations and safety and tolerability (secondary). Results: A total of 187 patients were enrolled in Asia (pembrolizumab, n = 62; pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, n = 64; chemotherapy, n = 61). Compared with the global population, higher proportions of patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 and a diagnosis of stomach cancer. In the programmed death ligand 1 combined positive score ≥1 population, median overall survival was numerically longer with pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy (22.7 vs 13.8 months; hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.82) and pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy (16.5 vs 13.8 months; hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-1.16). In the programmed death ligand 1 combined positive score ≥10 population, median overall survival was also numerically longer with pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy (28.5 vs 14.8 months; hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.89) and pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy (17.5 vs 14.8 months; hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-1.64). The grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse event rate was 19.4%, 75.8% and 64.9% for patients receiving pembrolizumab, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy, respectively. Conclusions: This post hoc analysis showed pembrolizumab monotherapy was associated with numerically improved overall survival and a favourable tolerability profile versus chemotherapy in Asians with programmed death ligand 1-positive advanced gastric cancer/gastrooesophageal junction cancer. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02494583.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)221-229
Number of pages9
JournalJapanese Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume53
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Asian patients
  • chemotherapy
  • gastric cancer
  • gastrooesophageal junction cancer
  • pembrolizumab

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus standard of care chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: Asian subgroup analysis of KEYNOTE-062'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this