TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient-Reported Outcomes From Phase III Neoadjuvant Systemic Trial Comparing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Pre-Menopausal Patients With Estrogen Receptor-Positive and HER2-Negative, Lymph Node-Positive Breast Cancer
AU - Gwark, Sungchan
AU - Ahn, Sei Hyun
AU - Noh, Woo Chul
AU - Lee, Eun Sook
AU - Jung, Yongsik
AU - Kim, Lee Su
AU - Han, Wonshik
AU - Nam, Seok Jin
AU - Gong, Gyungyub
AU - Kim, Seon Ok
AU - Kim, Hee Jeong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright © 2021 Gwark, Ahn, Noh, Lee, Jung, Kim, Han, Nam, Gong, Kim and Kim.
PY - 2021/7/2
Y1 - 2021/7/2
N2 - We aimed to evaluate the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in a prospective phase III clinical trial, comparing neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) with conventional neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) in patients with hormone status positive, lymph node-positive premenopausal breast cancer (NCT01622361). The patients were randomized prospectively to either 24 weeks of NCT with adriamycin plus cyclophosphamide followed by taxane or NET with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and tamoxifen. The patients were examined at the surgery unit of a large tertiary care hospital with a comprehensive cancer center. PROs were assessed on the first day of the trial (day 1, baseline) and at the end of treatment, using the breast cancer module of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 23 (EORTC QLQ BR23). One hundred and eighty-seven patients were randomly assigned to chemotherapy (n=95) or endocrine therapy (n=92), and 174 patients completed 24 weeks of the neoadjuvant treatment period (n=87, in each group). Baseline scores were similar between the groups. After treatment, there were no statistically significant differences in the function scales, including body image, sexual functioning, and sexual enjoyment between the groups, although the endocrine treatment group showed a significant improvement in the future perspective (hazard ratio, 8.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.72–18.38; P = 0.021). Similarly, there were no statistically significant differences in the symptom scales between the groups, including adverse effects of systemic therapy, breast symptoms, arm symptoms, and upset about hair loss. In conclusion, overall PROs were similar in both treatment groups, except for “future perspective,” which was significantly better in the NET group than in the NCT group. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.Gov, identifier NCT01622361.
AB - We aimed to evaluate the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in a prospective phase III clinical trial, comparing neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) with conventional neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) in patients with hormone status positive, lymph node-positive premenopausal breast cancer (NCT01622361). The patients were randomized prospectively to either 24 weeks of NCT with adriamycin plus cyclophosphamide followed by taxane or NET with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and tamoxifen. The patients were examined at the surgery unit of a large tertiary care hospital with a comprehensive cancer center. PROs were assessed on the first day of the trial (day 1, baseline) and at the end of treatment, using the breast cancer module of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 23 (EORTC QLQ BR23). One hundred and eighty-seven patients were randomly assigned to chemotherapy (n=95) or endocrine therapy (n=92), and 174 patients completed 24 weeks of the neoadjuvant treatment period (n=87, in each group). Baseline scores were similar between the groups. After treatment, there were no statistically significant differences in the function scales, including body image, sexual functioning, and sexual enjoyment between the groups, although the endocrine treatment group showed a significant improvement in the future perspective (hazard ratio, 8.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.72–18.38; P = 0.021). Similarly, there were no statistically significant differences in the symptom scales between the groups, including adverse effects of systemic therapy, breast symptoms, arm symptoms, and upset about hair loss. In conclusion, overall PROs were similar in both treatment groups, except for “future perspective,” which was significantly better in the NET group than in the NCT group. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.Gov, identifier NCT01622361.
KW - HER2-negative
KW - lymph node-positive breaST cancer (NEST)
KW - neoadjuvant chemotherapy
KW - neoadjuvant endocrine therapy
KW - Neoadjuvant stusdy of chemotherapy versus Endocrine therapy in premenopausal patient with hormone responsive
KW - patient-reported outcomes
KW - quality of life
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85110503762
U2 - 10.3389/fonc.2021.608207
DO - 10.3389/fonc.2021.608207
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85110503762
SN - 2234-943X
VL - 11
JO - Frontiers in Oncology
JF - Frontiers in Oncology
M1 - 608207
ER -