TY - JOUR
T1 - Overall Survival with Amivantamab–Lazertinib in EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC
AU - MARIPOSA Investigators
AU - Yang, James Chih Hsin
AU - Lu, Shun
AU - Hayashi, Hidetoshi
AU - Felip, Enriqueta
AU - Spira, Alexander I.
AU - Girard, Nicolas
AU - Kim, Yu Jung
AU - Lee, Se Hoon
AU - Ostapenko, Yurii
AU - Danchaivijitr, Pongwut
AU - Liu, Baogang
AU - Alip, Adlinda
AU - Korbenfeld, Ernesto
AU - Dias, Josiane Mourão
AU - Besse, Benjamin
AU - Passaro, Antonio
AU - Lee, Ki Hyeong
AU - Xiong, Hailin
AU - How, Soon Hin
AU - Cheng, Ying
AU - Chang, Gee Chen
AU - Yoshioka, Hiroshige
AU - Thomas, Michael
AU - Nguyen, Danny
AU - Ou, Sai Hong Ignatius
AU - Mukhedkar, Sanjay
AU - Prabhash, Kumar
AU - D’Arcangelo, Manolo
AU - Alatorre-Alexander, Jorge
AU - Limón, Juan Carlos Vázquez
AU - Alves, Sara
AU - Stroyakovskiy, Daniil
AU - Peregudova, Marina
AU - Şendur, Mehmet Ali Na Hit
AU - Yazici, Ozan
AU - Califano, Raffaele
AU - Calderón, Vanesa Gutiérrez
AU - de Marinis, Filippo
AU - Kim, Sang We
AU - Gadgeel, Shirish M.
AU - Owen, Scott
AU - Xie, John
AU - Sun, Tao
AU - Mehta, Jaydeep
AU - Venkatasubramanian, Raja
AU - Ennis, Mariah
AU - Fennema, Elizabeth
AU - Daksh, Mahesh
AU - Roshak, Amy
AU - Man, Julie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 Massachusetts Medical Society.
PY - 2025/10/30
Y1 - 2025/10/30
N2 - BACKGROUND Previous results from this phase 3 trial showed that progression-free survival among participants with previously untreated EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor)–mutated advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was significantly improved with amivantamab–lazertinib as compared with osimertinib. Results of the protocol-specified final overall survival analysis in this trial have not been reported. METHODS We randomly assigned, in a 2:2:1 ratio, participants with previously untreated EGFRmutated (exon 19 deletion or L858R substitution), locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC to receive amivantamab–lazertinib, osimertinib, or lazertinib. Overall survival (assessed in an analysis of the time from randomization to death from any cause) in the amivantamab–lazertinib group as compared with the osimertinib group was a key secondary end point. Additional end points included safety. RESULTS A total of 429 participants each were assigned to receive amivantamab–lazertinib or osimertinib. Over a median follow-up of 37.8 months, amivantamab–lazertinib led to significantly longer overall survival than osimertinib (hazard ratio for death, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.61 to 0.92; P=0.005); 3-year overall survival was 60% and 51%, respectively. At the clinical cutoff date, 38% of participants in the amivantamab–lazertinib group and 28% in the osimertinib group were still receiving the assigned treatment. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were more common with amivantamab–lazertinib (in 80% of participants) than with osimertinib (in 52%), particularly skin-related events, venous thromboembolism, and infusion-related events; these findings were consistent with the established safety profile of each treatment. No new safety signals were observed with additional follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Amivantamab–lazertinib led to significantly longer overall survival among participants with previously untreated EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC than osimertinib but was associated with an increased risk of adverse events of grade 3 or higher.
AB - BACKGROUND Previous results from this phase 3 trial showed that progression-free survival among participants with previously untreated EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor)–mutated advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was significantly improved with amivantamab–lazertinib as compared with osimertinib. Results of the protocol-specified final overall survival analysis in this trial have not been reported. METHODS We randomly assigned, in a 2:2:1 ratio, participants with previously untreated EGFRmutated (exon 19 deletion or L858R substitution), locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC to receive amivantamab–lazertinib, osimertinib, or lazertinib. Overall survival (assessed in an analysis of the time from randomization to death from any cause) in the amivantamab–lazertinib group as compared with the osimertinib group was a key secondary end point. Additional end points included safety. RESULTS A total of 429 participants each were assigned to receive amivantamab–lazertinib or osimertinib. Over a median follow-up of 37.8 months, amivantamab–lazertinib led to significantly longer overall survival than osimertinib (hazard ratio for death, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.61 to 0.92; P=0.005); 3-year overall survival was 60% and 51%, respectively. At the clinical cutoff date, 38% of participants in the amivantamab–lazertinib group and 28% in the osimertinib group were still receiving the assigned treatment. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were more common with amivantamab–lazertinib (in 80% of participants) than with osimertinib (in 52%), particularly skin-related events, venous thromboembolism, and infusion-related events; these findings were consistent with the established safety profile of each treatment. No new safety signals were observed with additional follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Amivantamab–lazertinib led to significantly longer overall survival among participants with previously untreated EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC than osimertinib but was associated with an increased risk of adverse events of grade 3 or higher.
KW - Hematology/Oncology
KW - Lung Cancer
KW - Pulmonary/Critical Care
KW - Pulmonary/Critical Care General
KW - Treatments in Oncology
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105020620968
U2 - 10.1056/NEJMoa2503001
DO - 10.1056/NEJMoa2503001
M3 - Article
C2 - 40923797
AN - SCOPUS:105020620968
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 393
SP - 1681
EP - 1693
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
IS - 17
ER -