Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Osimertinib or platinum-pemetrexed in EGFR T790M-Positive lung cancer

  • T. S. Mok
  • , Y. L. Wu
  • , M. J. Ahn
  • , M. C. Garassino
  • , H. R. Kim
  • , S. S. Ramalingam
  • , F. A. Shepherd
  • , Y. He
  • , H. Akamatsu
  • , W. S.M.E. Theelen
  • , C. K. Lee
  • , M. Sebastian
  • , A. Templeton
  • , H. Mann
  • , M. Marotti
  • , S. Ghiorghiu
  • , V. A. Papadimitrakopoulou
  • Prince of Wales Hospital Hong Kong
  • Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences
  • Sungkyunkwan University
  • IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale per lo studio e la cura dei tumori - Milano
  • Yonsei University
  • Emory University
  • Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
  • Daping Hospital, the Third Military Medical University
  • Wakayama Medical University
  • Netherlands Cancer Institute
  • St. George Hospital
  • Goethe University Frankfurt
  • AstraZeneca
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND Osimertinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that is selective for both EGFR-TKI sensitizing and T790M resistance mutations in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. The efficacy of osimertinib as compared with platinum-based therapy plus pemetrexed in such patients is unknown. METHODS In this randomized, international, open-label, phase 3 trial, we assigned 419 patients with T790M-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, who had disease progression after first-line EGFR-TKI therapy, in a 2:1 ratio to receive either oral osimertinib (at a dose of 80 mg once daily) or intravenous pemetrexed (500 mg per square meter of body-surface area) plus either carboplatin (target area under the curve, 5 [AUC5]) or cisplatin (75 mg per square meter) every 3 weeks for up to six cycles; maintenance pemetrexed was allowed. In all the patients, disease had progressed during receipt of first-line EGFR-TKI therapy. The primary end point was investigator-Assessed progression-free survival. RESULTS The median duration of progression-free survival was significantly longer with osimertinib than with platinum therapy plus pemetrexed (10.1 months vs. 4.4 months; hazard ratio; 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.41; P<0.001). The objective response rate was significantly better with osimertinib (71%; 95% CI, 65 to 76) than with platinum therapy plus pemetrexed (31%; 95% CI, 24 to 40) (odds ratio for objective response, 5.39; 95% CI, 3.47 to 8.48; P<0.001). Among 144 patients with metastases to the central nervous system (CNS), the median duration of progression-free survival was longer among patients receiving osimertinib than among those receiving platinum therapy plus pemetrexed (8.5 months vs. 4.2 months; hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.49). The proportion of patients with adverse events of grade 3 or higher was lower with osimertinib (23%) than with platinum therapy plus pemetrexed (47%). CONCLUSIONS Osimertinib had significantly greater efficacy than platinum therapy plus pemetrexed in patients with T790M-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (including those with CNS metastases) in whom disease had progressed during first-line EGFR-TKI therapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)629-640
Number of pages12
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume376
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 16 Feb 2017
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Osimertinib or platinum-pemetrexed in EGFR T790M-Positive lung cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this