TY - JOUR
T1 - Open-type congenital cholesteatoma
T2 - Differential diagnosis for conductive hearing loss with a normal tympanic membrane
AU - Kim, Se Hyung
AU - Cho, Yang Sun
AU - Chu, Ho Suk
AU - Jang, Jeon Yeob
AU - Chung, Won Ho
AU - Hong, Sung Hwa
PY - 2012/6
Y1 - 2012/6
N2 - Conclusion: In patients with progressive conductive hearing loss and a normal tympanic membrane (TM), and with soft tissue density in the middle ear cavity (MEC) on temporal bone computed tomography (TBCT) scan, open-type congenital cholesteatoma (OCC) should be highly suspected and a proper surgical plan that includes mastoid exploration and second-stage operation is required. Objective: The clinical presentation of OCC is very similar to congenital ossicular anomaly (COA) presenting with a conductive hearing loss with intact TM. Therefore, it is challenging to make a correct preoperative diagnosis in patients with OCC. We evaluated the clinical characteristics of OCC compared with those of COA to find diagnostic clues useful in diagnosis of OCC. Methods: The medical records of 12 patients with surgically proven OCC and 14 patients with surgically proven COA were reviewed for demographic data, otologic history, preoperative TBCT findings, intraoperative findings, and pre- and postoperative audiologic data. Results: There was no difference between OCC and COA based on demographic data, preoperative hearing, and ossicular status on TBCT. However, the presence of progressive hearing loss, soft tissue density in the MEC on TBCT scan, and the need for mastoid surgery and second-stage operation were significantly more frequent in OCC patients.
AB - Conclusion: In patients with progressive conductive hearing loss and a normal tympanic membrane (TM), and with soft tissue density in the middle ear cavity (MEC) on temporal bone computed tomography (TBCT) scan, open-type congenital cholesteatoma (OCC) should be highly suspected and a proper surgical plan that includes mastoid exploration and second-stage operation is required. Objective: The clinical presentation of OCC is very similar to congenital ossicular anomaly (COA) presenting with a conductive hearing loss with intact TM. Therefore, it is challenging to make a correct preoperative diagnosis in patients with OCC. We evaluated the clinical characteristics of OCC compared with those of COA to find diagnostic clues useful in diagnosis of OCC. Methods: The medical records of 12 patients with surgically proven OCC and 14 patients with surgically proven COA were reviewed for demographic data, otologic history, preoperative TBCT findings, intraoperative findings, and pre- and postoperative audiologic data. Results: There was no difference between OCC and COA based on demographic data, preoperative hearing, and ossicular status on TBCT. However, the presence of progressive hearing loss, soft tissue density in the MEC on TBCT scan, and the need for mastoid surgery and second-stage operation were significantly more frequent in OCC patients.
KW - Congenital ossicular anomaly
KW - Middle ear
KW - Temporal bone computed tomography
KW - X-ray
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84861018213
U2 - 10.3109/00016489.2011.652743
DO - 10.3109/00016489.2011.652743
M3 - Article
C2 - 22497639
AN - SCOPUS:84861018213
SN - 0001-6489
VL - 132
SP - 618
EP - 623
JO - Acta Oto-Laryngologica
JF - Acta Oto-Laryngologica
IS - 6
ER -