Abstract
The continued interest in (neo-)pragmatism for public administration is a validation of the very kind of democratic discourse that the philosophy holds dear. Yet the back-and-forth also reinforces a critique coming from one of its major figures, Richard Rorty: We seem to be jockeying for position in an analytic language game that will never have a winner. The matter may not be “settled” per se, but the groundwork of (neo-)pragmatism’s use in public administration is practically done and, in the spirit of one of its very basic ideas, administrators should sally forth and see how it works.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1110-1125 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Administration and Society |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Nov 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- efficacy
- neopragmatism
- pragmatism