One More Look at (Neo-)Pragmatism in Public Administration: Seeing the Forest and the Trees

  • David Oliver Kasdan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

The continued interest in (neo-)pragmatism for public administration is a validation of the very kind of democratic discourse that the philosophy holds dear. Yet the back-and-forth also reinforces a critique coming from one of its major figures, Richard Rorty: We seem to be jockeying for position in an analytic language game that will never have a winner. The matter may not be “settled” per se, but the groundwork of (neo-)pragmatism’s use in public administration is practically done and, in the spirit of one of its very basic ideas, administrators should sally forth and see how it works.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1110-1125
Number of pages16
JournalAdministration and Society
Volume47
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • efficacy
  • neopragmatism
  • pragmatism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'One More Look at (Neo-)Pragmatism in Public Administration: Seeing the Forest and the Trees'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this