Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Nintedanib plus pemetrexed versus placebo plus pemetrexed in patients with relapsed or refractory, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LUME-Lung 2): A randomized, double-blind, phase III trial

  • Nasser H. Hanna
  • , Rolf Kaiser
  • , Richard N. Sullivan
  • , Osvaldo Rudy Aren
  • , Myung Ju Ahn
  • , Beatrice Tiangco
  • , Isabelle Voccia
  • , Joachim von Pawel
  • , Vladimir Kovcin
  • , Jason Agulnik
  • , Birgit Gaschler-Markefski
  • , José Barrueco
  • , Patricia Sikken
  • , Charles Schloss
  • , Joo Hang Kim
  • Indiana University Bloomington
  • Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH
  • University of Göttingen
  • Auckland District Health Board
  • Instituto Nacional del Cáncer, Chile
  • Sungkyunkwan University
  • National Kidney and Transplant Institute Philippines
  • Pneumology Clinic
  • Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa
  • McGill University
  • Yonsei University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives LUME-Lung 2 investigated the efficacy/safety of nintedanib plus pemetrexed in patients with pretreated non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Materials and methods Patients with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent non-squamous NSCLC who had received one prior chemotherapy regimen were randomized (1:1 stratified by histology [adenocarcinoma/non-adenocarcinoma], prior bevacizumab, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and presence of brain metastases) to receive intravenous pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 on Day 1 plus nintedanib 200 mg orally twice daily or matching placebo on Days 2–21, every 3 weeks until progression/unacceptable toxicity. Progression-free survival (PFS) by independent central review was the primary endpoint. Overall survival (OS) was the key secondary endpoint. Results Based on the pre-planned futility analysis of investigator-assessed PFS, conducted by an independent data monitoring committee, recruitment was halted on 18 June 2011 after 713 (n = 353 nintedanib/pemetrexed; n = 360 placebo/pemetrexed)/1300 planned patients had enrolled. There were no safety concerns. Subsequent analysis demonstrated a significant improvement in PFS favoring nintedanib/pemetrexed over placebo/pemetrexed (median 4.4 months vs 3.6 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70–0.99, p = 0.0435). There was no significant difference in OS (median 12.0 months vs 12.7 months; HR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.85–1.21, p = 0.8940) after 514 deaths. Nintedanib/pemetrexed resulted in a higher incidence of grade ≥3 elevated alanine aminotransferase (23.3% vs 7.3%), elevated aspartate aminotransferase (12.1% vs 1.7%) and diarrhea (3.5% vs 1.1%) compared with placebo/pemetrexed, but no difference in hypertension, bleeding or thrombosis. Conclusion Although recruitment stopped prematurely, combining nintedanib with pemetrexed significantly prolonged PFS in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC after first-line chemotherapy, with a manageable safety profile.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)65-73
Number of pages9
JournalLung Cancer
Volume102
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2016
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Angiogenesis inhibitor
  • Nintedanib
  • Non-small cell lung cancer
  • Phase III
  • Second-line

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nintedanib plus pemetrexed versus placebo plus pemetrexed in patients with relapsed or refractory, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LUME-Lung 2): A randomized, double-blind, phase III trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this