Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

National cancer screening program for gastric cancer in Korea: Nationwide treatment benefit and cost

  • Yun Suhk Suh
  • , Joonki Lee
  • , Hyeongtaek Woo
  • , Dongwook Shin
  • , Seong Ho Kong
  • , Hyuk Joon Lee
  • , Aesun Shin
  • , Han Kwang Yang
  • Seoul National University
  • Sungkyunkwan University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the nationwide benefit and cost of the national cancer screening program (NCSP) for gastric cancer treatment. Methods: For this nationwide, population-based study, the Korean National Health Insurance Big Data Base, which included gastric cancer–related treatment information and the costs for all patients with gastric cancer who were 40 years old or older between 2004 and 2013, was restructured. Patients with gastric cancer who participated in the NCSP at least once (the screening group) were compared with those who did not participate in the NCSP (the nonscreening group). Results: The screening group (n = 116,775) spent significantly less on medical care expenses than the nonscreening group (n = 74,927) during the 5 years since the initial treatment (P <.0001). The screening group presented a significantly better prognosis for 5 and 9 years than the nonscreening group (P <.0001). The screening group revealed a 41% decreased hazard ratio (P <.0001) for death in comparison with the nonscreening group; the prognostic benefit became more obvious when treatment was started within the first 4 months after screening. The age-standardized mortality rate ratio of the screening group versus the nonscreening group was 0.62 (P <.0001). The NCSP for gastric cancer required an average of 22,169,769 Korean Republic won (US $20,309) for 1 life-year saved, which was less than the average gross domestic product (GDP) per capita in Korea. Conclusions: The screening group had significantly lower medical care expenses and showed a significantly better prognosis than the nonscreening group. On the basis of the GDP per capita, the NCSP for gastric cancer was cost-effective for treatment prognosis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1929-1939
Number of pages11
JournalCancer
Volume126
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2020
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • big data
  • cancer screening
  • gastric cancer
  • population
  • prognosis
  • treatment cost

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'National cancer screening program for gastric cancer in Korea: Nationwide treatment benefit and cost'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this