Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Monitoring the impact of dissolved oxygen and nitrite on anoxic biofilm in continuous denitrification process

  • Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

An anoxic biofilm involved in continuous denitrification process was monitored to investigate the effect of different concentrations of influent dissolved oxygen (DO) or nitrite on the biofilm. Microelectrode measurements evidenced nitrate removal activity of biofilm. When different concentrations of DO were applied to the reactor, generally decreased concentrations of DO were observed as bed depth increased from the bottom of the reactor. Greatest decrease of the DO was observed in the lower 20% of the bed depth. Nitrate removal efficiency was inversely proportional to influent DO concentrations (8.3-11.9 DO mg L-1) or nitrite loading rates (0-5.5 N-NO2- kg m-3 day-1) employed in this study. Nitrite loading rates to achieve more than 90% of nitrate removal efficiency were 1.46 N-NO2- kg m-3 day-1 or less at pH 7.5 and 0.34 N-NO2- kg m-3 day-1 or less at pH 6.8. Nitrate removal efficiency was 63% or more within the lower 20% of the bed depth at the nitrite loading rates that allowed more than 90% of nitrate removal efficiency of the reactor. The results of this study provide first quantitative data that nitrate removal performance of an anoxic biofilm is inhibited by DO or nitrite, reported to be a limiting factor in the suspended biological denitrification process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)133-144
Number of pages12
JournalEnvironmental Monitoring and Assessment
Volume87
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2003
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Anoxic biofilm
  • Denitrification
  • Dissolved oxygen
  • Microelectrode
  • Nitrite

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Monitoring the impact of dissolved oxygen and nitrite on anoxic biofilm in continuous denitrification process'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this