Modified FOLFIRINOX versus S-1 as second-line chemotherapy in gemcitabine-failed metastatic pancreatic cancer patients: A randomised controlled trial (MPACA-3)

  • Se Il Go
  • , Sang Cheol Lee
  • , Woo Kyun Bae
  • , Dae Young Zang
  • , Hyun Woo Lee
  • , Joung Soon Jang
  • , Jun Ho Ji
  • , Jung Hoon Kim
  • , Sanggon Park
  • , Sun Jin Sym
  • , Yaewon Yang
  • , So Yeon Jeon
  • , In Gyu Hwang
  • , Sung Yong Oh
  • , Jung Hun Kang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) as a second-line chemotherapy treatment for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPAC), remains unclear. This multi-center randomised phase III trial aimed to elucidate the efficacy of mFOLFIRINOX as a second-line chemotherapy treatment for mPAC patients with good performance status. Patients and methods: Eighty mPAC patients (age, 19–75 years) refractory to first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy were randomly selected to receive mFOLFIRINOX or S-1. mFOLFIRINOX comprised oxaliplatin (65 mg/m2), irinotecan (135 mg/m2), and leucovorin (400 mg/m2) on day 1 and continuous 5-FU infusion (1000 mg/m2) over 24 h on days 1–2 every 2 weeks. S-1 comprised body surface area-dependent oral S-1, divided into two doses per day on days 1–28 every 6 weeks. Results: Overall survival was the primary endpoint. The objective response and disease control rates were higher in the mFOLFIRINOX than in the S-1 group (15% versus 2%; p = .04 and 67% versus 37%; p = .007). The median progression-free survival rates were 5.2 and 2.2 months in the mFOLFIRINOX and S-1 groups, respectively (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: .4; 95% confidence interval [CI]: .2-.6; p < .001). The median overall survival rates were 9.2 and 4.9 months in the mFOLFIRINOX and S-1 groups, respectively (adjusted HR: .4; 95% CI: .2–.7; p = .002). Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 56% and 17% of the patients in the mFOLFIRINOX and S-1 groups, respectively (p < .001). Conclusion: Administration of mFOLFIRINOX as a second-line chemotherapy treatment for mPAC patients refractory to gemcitabine-based chemotherapy resulted in increased survival rates than S-1 treatment alone.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)21-30
Number of pages10
JournalEuropean Journal of Cancer
Volume157
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2021
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Gemcitabine
  • Modified FOLFIRINOX
  • Pancreatic neoplasms
  • Randomised controlled trial
  • S-1
  • Second-line chemotherapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Modified FOLFIRINOX versus S-1 as second-line chemotherapy in gemcitabine-failed metastatic pancreatic cancer patients: A randomised controlled trial (MPACA-3)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this