TY - JOUR
T1 - Mistargeting after fusion imaging-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinomas
AU - Lim, Sanghyeok
AU - Lee, Min Woo
AU - Rhim, Hyunchul
AU - Cha, Dong Ik
AU - Kang, Tae Wook
AU - Min, Ji Hye
AU - Song, Kyoung Doo
AU - Choi, Seo Youn
AU - Lim, Hyo K.
PY - 2014/2
Y1 - 2014/2
N2 - Purpose To evaluate the incidence and causes of mistargeting after fusion imaging-guided percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). Materials and Methods Between September 2011 and March 2013, 955 HCCs in 732 patients were treated with percutaneous RF ablation. Among them, ablation of 551 HCCs was accomplished under fusion imaging guidance, and seven mistargetings were noted in seven patients (male-to-female ratio = 6:1; mean age, 60.1 y; range, 47-73 y). The incidence of mistargeting and the cause of liver disease in the patients with mistargeting were evaluated. The causes of mistargeting were assessed according to the following classification: small size of HCC, subcapsular location, subphrenic location, confusion with pseudolesions, poor conspicuity of HCC, poor sonographic window, and poor electrode path. Results The incidence of mistargeting after fusion imaging-guided RF ablation was 1.3% (7 of 551). All patients with mistargeting were hepatitis B virus carriers. The most common cause of mistargeting was the small size of HCC (100%; 7 of 7), followed by confusion with surrounding pseudolesions (85.7%; 6 of 7), subcapsular (71.4%; 5 of 7) and subphrenic locations (71.4%; 5 of 7), poor conspicuity of the HCC (71.4%; 6 of 7), poor sonographic window (28.6%; 2 of 7), and poor electrode path (28.6%; 2 of 7). Conclusions The incidence of mistargeting after fusion imaging-guided RF ablation was 1.3%. The most common cause of mistargeting was the small size of HCC, followed by confusion with surrounding pseudolesions, subcapsular and subphrenic locations, and poor conspicuity of the HCC.
AB - Purpose To evaluate the incidence and causes of mistargeting after fusion imaging-guided percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). Materials and Methods Between September 2011 and March 2013, 955 HCCs in 732 patients were treated with percutaneous RF ablation. Among them, ablation of 551 HCCs was accomplished under fusion imaging guidance, and seven mistargetings were noted in seven patients (male-to-female ratio = 6:1; mean age, 60.1 y; range, 47-73 y). The incidence of mistargeting and the cause of liver disease in the patients with mistargeting were evaluated. The causes of mistargeting were assessed according to the following classification: small size of HCC, subcapsular location, subphrenic location, confusion with pseudolesions, poor conspicuity of HCC, poor sonographic window, and poor electrode path. Results The incidence of mistargeting after fusion imaging-guided RF ablation was 1.3% (7 of 551). All patients with mistargeting were hepatitis B virus carriers. The most common cause of mistargeting was the small size of HCC (100%; 7 of 7), followed by confusion with surrounding pseudolesions (85.7%; 6 of 7), subcapsular (71.4%; 5 of 7) and subphrenic locations (71.4%; 5 of 7), poor conspicuity of the HCC (71.4%; 6 of 7), poor sonographic window (28.6%; 2 of 7), and poor electrode path (28.6%; 2 of 7). Conclusions The incidence of mistargeting after fusion imaging-guided RF ablation was 1.3%. The most common cause of mistargeting was the small size of HCC, followed by confusion with surrounding pseudolesions, subcapsular and subphrenic locations, and poor conspicuity of the HCC.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84893686482
U2 - 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.10.025
DO - 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.10.025
M3 - Article
C2 - 24315550
AN - SCOPUS:84893686482
SN - 1051-0443
VL - 25
SP - 307
EP - 314
JO - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
JF - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
IS - 2
ER -