Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Management of Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (RPS) in the Adult: An Updated Consensus Approach from the Transatlantic Australasian RPS Working Group

  • on behalf of the Transatlantic Australasian RPS Working Group (TARPSWG)
  • Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
  • University of Toronto
  • Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
  • Université PSL
  • Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute of Oncology
  • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
  • Moffitt Cancer Center
  • Peter Maccallum Cancer Centre
  • Harvard University
  • Netherlands Cancer Institute
  • Centre Georges-François Leclerc
  • Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
  • University of Ottawa
  • Emory University
  • IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale per lo studio e la cura dei tumori - Milano
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas comprise a heterogeneous group of rare tumors of mesenchymal origin that include several well-defined histologic subtypes. In 2015, the Transatlantic Australasian RPS Working Group (TARPSWG) published consensus recommendations for the best management of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). Since then, through international collaboration, new evidence and knowledge have been generated, creating the need for an updated consensus document. Methods: The primary aim of this study was to critically evaluate the current evidence and develop an up-to-date consensus document on the approach to these difficult tumors. The resulting document applies to primary RPS that is non-visceral in origin, with exclusion criteria as previously described. The relevant literature was evaluated and an international group of experts consulted to formulate consensus statements regarding the best management of primary RPS. A level of evidence and grade of recommendation were attributed to each new/updated recommendation. Results: Management of primary RPS was considered from diagnosis to follow-up. This rare and complex malignancy is best managed by an experienced multidisciplinary team in a specialized referral center. The best chance of cure is at the time of primary presentation, and an individualized management plan should be made based on the 29 consensus statements included in this article, which were agreed upon by all of the authors. Whenever possible, patients should be enrolled in prospective trials and studies. Conclusions: Ongoing international collaboration is critical to expand upon current knowledge and further improve outcomes of patients with RPS. In addition, prospective data collection and participation in multi-institution trials are strongly encouraged.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)7873-7888
Number of pages16
JournalAnnals of Surgical Oncology
Volume28
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Management of Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (RPS) in the Adult: An Updated Consensus Approach from the Transatlantic Australasian RPS Working Group'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this