TY - JOUR
T1 - Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Physeal Violation in Adolescents After Transphyseal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
AU - Wang, Joon Ho
AU - Son, Kang Min
AU - Lee, Dae Hee
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Arthroscopy Association of North America
PY - 2017/6
Y1 - 2017/6
N2 - Purpose To quantify and compare the amount and location of physis violation of the distal femur and proximal tibia after transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in skeletally immature patients. Methods This study included 19 patients with open physes of the distal femur and proximal tibia who underwent ACL reconstruction with tibialis anterior allografts. Physeal tunnel volume and location on the growth plate, as well as obliquity to the growth plate, were measured by 3-dimensional postoperative magnetic resonance imaging of the distal femur and proximal tibia. Results The percentage of physeal violation (ratio of the tunnel to the entire growth plate area) was similar for the distal femur and proximal tibia (3.95% vs 3.65%, P =.582). There were no differences in tunnel obliquity to the growth plate in the coronal (56.1° vs 71.6°, P =.061) and sagittal (85.9° vs 74.9°, P =.092) planes. The distal femoral tunnel was located 6.2% (17.2% vs 23.4%, P =.001) more peripherally in the anteroposterior direction and 9.7% (27.1% vs 36.8%, P <.001) more peripherally in the mediolateral direction than was the tibial tunnel. Conclusions The mean percentages of physeal violation of tunnel creation during ACL reconstruction in adolescent patients were 3.95% for the distal femur and 3.65% for the proximal tibia. Moreover, femoral tunnels were located more peripherally on the growth plate than were tibial tunnels, in both the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions. Level of Evidence Level IV, case series.
AB - Purpose To quantify and compare the amount and location of physis violation of the distal femur and proximal tibia after transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in skeletally immature patients. Methods This study included 19 patients with open physes of the distal femur and proximal tibia who underwent ACL reconstruction with tibialis anterior allografts. Physeal tunnel volume and location on the growth plate, as well as obliquity to the growth plate, were measured by 3-dimensional postoperative magnetic resonance imaging of the distal femur and proximal tibia. Results The percentage of physeal violation (ratio of the tunnel to the entire growth plate area) was similar for the distal femur and proximal tibia (3.95% vs 3.65%, P =.582). There were no differences in tunnel obliquity to the growth plate in the coronal (56.1° vs 71.6°, P =.061) and sagittal (85.9° vs 74.9°, P =.092) planes. The distal femoral tunnel was located 6.2% (17.2% vs 23.4%, P =.001) more peripherally in the anteroposterior direction and 9.7% (27.1% vs 36.8%, P <.001) more peripherally in the mediolateral direction than was the tibial tunnel. Conclusions The mean percentages of physeal violation of tunnel creation during ACL reconstruction in adolescent patients were 3.95% for the distal femur and 3.65% for the proximal tibia. Moreover, femoral tunnels were located more peripherally on the growth plate than were tibial tunnels, in both the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions. Level of Evidence Level IV, case series.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85011117631
U2 - 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.12.011
DO - 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.12.011
M3 - Article
C2 - 28159425
AN - SCOPUS:85011117631
SN - 0749-8063
VL - 33
SP - 1211
EP - 1218
JO - Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
JF - Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
IS - 6
ER -