TY - JOUR
T1 - Learning curve of various type of male urethroplasty
AU - Choi, Joongwon
AU - Lee, Chung Un
AU - Sung, Hyun Hwan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Korean Urological Association.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Purpose: To determine the number of cases required to achieve a specified recurrence-free rate (>80%) among urethroplasty types. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients, who underwent urethroplasty performed by a single surgeon between April 2013 and January 2019, was conducted. Urethroplasty subtypes were divided according to stricture loca-tion: penile, bulbar, and posterior. If there was no recurrence for >6 months after surgery, the surgery was considered to be a suc-cess. The average success rates among quintile groups were compared to determine the learning curve for each type. Results: Of 150 patients who underwent urethroplasty, 112 were included in this study. The overall success rate was 89.7% in pe-nile, 97.8% in bulbar, and 74.1% in posterior urethroplasty. Bulbar urethroplasty reached the target success rate in the first quintile group (1–9 cases). Penile urethroplasty also achieved the target success rate in the first quintile group (1–8 cases), and the success rate gradually increased until the fifth quintile group (32–39 cases). In posterior urethroplasty, the target success rate was achieved in the fifth quintile group (20–27 cases). Conclusions: Bulbar urethroplasty had the fastest learning curve, and posterior urethroplasty the slowest.
AB - Purpose: To determine the number of cases required to achieve a specified recurrence-free rate (>80%) among urethroplasty types. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients, who underwent urethroplasty performed by a single surgeon between April 2013 and January 2019, was conducted. Urethroplasty subtypes were divided according to stricture loca-tion: penile, bulbar, and posterior. If there was no recurrence for >6 months after surgery, the surgery was considered to be a suc-cess. The average success rates among quintile groups were compared to determine the learning curve for each type. Results: Of 150 patients who underwent urethroplasty, 112 were included in this study. The overall success rate was 89.7% in pe-nile, 97.8% in bulbar, and 74.1% in posterior urethroplasty. Bulbar urethroplasty reached the target success rate in the first quintile group (1–9 cases). Penile urethroplasty also achieved the target success rate in the first quintile group (1–8 cases), and the success rate gradually increased until the fifth quintile group (32–39 cases). In posterior urethroplasty, the target success rate was achieved in the fifth quintile group (20–27 cases). Conclusions: Bulbar urethroplasty had the fastest learning curve, and posterior urethroplasty the slowest.
KW - Learning curve
KW - Reconstructive surgical procedures
KW - Urethral stricture
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85090178407
U2 - 10.4111/icu.20200076
DO - 10.4111/icu.20200076
M3 - Article
C2 - 32734726
AN - SCOPUS:85090178407
SN - 2466-0493
VL - 61
SP - 508
EP - 513
JO - Investigative and Clinical Urology
JF - Investigative and Clinical Urology
IS - 5
ER -